My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005570
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1985
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543949
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2020 5:54:41 PM
Creation date
7/27/2020 4:24:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005570
RECORD_ID
PR0543949
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024995
FACILITY_NAME
TED PETERS TRUCKING COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
1985
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
20014019
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1985 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geological Techgics W Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 640 2 <br /> May 8,2002 <br /> ' The groundwater gradient flow direction at the UST portion of the site has been consistently <br /> to the west or northwest for the nine events that it was measured <br /> a is <br /> Figure 2 groundwater gradient map for the event of January 17, 2002 A rose diagram <br /> g <br /> illustrating the historical groundwater gradients is presented in Figure 3 Table 1 in <br /> rAppendix A contains the groundwater elevations and gradients to date <br /> 12 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On January 17, 2002, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened the <br /> wells and measured the depths to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> water level readings were recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot In wells where free-floating <br /> product is suspected, a clear disposable bailer is used to gauge the interface During this <br /> monitoring, free product was not observed <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a centrifugal pump, as recorded on the <br /> field logs (Appendix Q The rate of well purging was monitored The wells were purged <br /> of at least three casing volumes and until the groundwater parameters (temperature, <br /> conductivity and pH) had stabilized (Appendix Q indicating that water representative of <br /> actual aquifer conditions was entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> characterized by three successive readings within 10% <br /> Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least <br /> 80% of the initial level All water removed from the monitoring well and not used as a <br /> sample, was placed in a properly labeled 55-gallon DOT (Department of Transportation) <br /> approved container and temporarily stored on-site <br /> A stainless steel bailer was used to collect each sample Extreme care was exercised while <br /> collecting samples to prevent agitation of the water contained in the bailer Water samples <br /> were transferred from the bailer into 40-m1 VOA vials preserved with hydrochloric acid, <br /> using a bottom-emptying device that minimizes sample aeration during transfer of the <br /> sample All samples were checked for headspace bubbles, labeled, inserted into foam <br /> holders and placed in an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> The sampling technician wore disposable gloves while collecting all samples <br /> A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected and their intended analyses, <br /> accompanied the samples from the field to the laboratory, thereby providing a means to <br /> track their movement and insure their integrity <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.