Laserfiche WebLink
cwkglutTeclmcslru Page 3 <br /> GW Monitoring Report <br /> Ted Peters-AST <br /> r Project No 701 2 <br /> May 15, 2003 <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> ' 21 Site Hydrology <br /> Site-specific groundwater gradients and bearings were calculated from the depth to water <br /> measurements taken during the event Two separate gradients were calculated for the three <br /> ' wells in the former UST location (MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3) and five wells in the former <br /> AST location (MW-4, MW-5, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8) Table 1 in Appendix A is a <br /> summary of water level elevations, gradient slopes and bearings and Table 4 includes well <br /> ' construction details Figure 2 is a groundwater gradient map for the site Historical <br /> groundwater direction and slope data are summarized in Figure 3 Groundwater Gradient <br /> Rose Diagram <br /> The average groundwater elevation of the AST wells was 12 29 feet above mean sea level <br /> The direction and gradient of groundwater for the April 2, 2003 monitoring event was <br /> N46°W at 0 008 ft/ft As indicated in Figure 3, a northwest direction was calculated for the <br /> sixth consecutive event since wells MW-7 and MW-8 were installed in March 2001 These <br /> data are offset by 900 when compared to the southwesterly directions noted on July 30, <br /> 1999, and February 17, 2000 The northeasterly flow direction in February 2001 is <br /> ' anomalous to the dominant westerly direction observed for the other monitoring events <br /> The field technician has previously noted that free product was present in well MW-5 and <br /> during this event a heavy sheen was observed The groundwater elevation datum for MW-5 <br /> is anomalous for the April 2003 event and is omitted from the contour diagram included in <br /> Figure 2 <br /> ' Groundwater gradient was also calculated from the three wells installed at the front of the <br /> site to investigate the UST area The gradient in this area was 0 004 ft/ft flowing N12% on <br /> April 2, 2003 This is anomalous with the other monitoring events completed during the <br /> investigation The gradient has consistently trended to the west to northwest in the past as <br /> evident in Figure 3 <br /> An examination of the AST area indicates that for the last six events the gradient was <br /> ' northwesterly This suggests that previous calculations were affected by the spatial <br /> orientation of the AST wells, the presence of free product in MW-5, or a combination of <br /> both It is also possible the local domestic wells located west of this property are <br /> influencing the gradients at the site <br /> A domestic well survey within 2,000 feet of the site was completed on August 16, 2000 <br /> ' The suivey efforts resulted in the identification of numerous domestic wells on the <br /> residential properties to the southwest, west and northwest of the site Ten wells were <br /> located in the properties to the immediate west of the subject site and their locations are <br /> identified in our "Well Receptor Report" dated September 11, 2000, (submitted to the SJC- <br /> ' PHS/EHD and the CRWQCB-CVR) <br /> 22 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> ' On April 2, 2003, Don Light of Del Tech Geotechnical Support arrived on-site, opened the <br /> wells and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot <br />