My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005597
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1985
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543949
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2020 6:32:36 PM
Creation date
7/27/2020 4:28:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005597
RECORD_ID
PR0543949
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024995
FACILITY_NAME
TED PETERS TRUCKING COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
1985
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
20014019
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1985 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Creologecalw4ficcsW Page 3 <br /> GW Monitoring Report <br /> Ted Peters -AST <br /> Project No 701 2 <br /> July 31, 2002 <br /> ' are offset by 90° when compared to the southwesterly directions noted on July 30, 1999, <br /> and February 17, 2000 The northeasterly flow direction in February 2001 is anomalous to <br /> ' the dominant westerly direction observed for the other monitoring events <br /> The field technician has previously noted that free product was present in well MW-5, but it <br /> was not observed for this event Groundwater elevation data for MW-5 is anomalous for the <br /> ' June 2002 event and are omitted from the contour diagram included in Figure 2 <br /> Groundwater gradient was also calculated from the three wells installed at the front of the <br /> site to investigate the UST area The gradient in this area was 0 001 ft/ft flowing N70°W <br /> This is consistent with the other monitoring events completed during the investigation The <br /> gradient has consistently trended to west to northwest in the past <br /> ' An examination of the AST area indicates that for the last four events the gradient was <br /> northwesterly This suggests that previous calculations were affected by the spatial <br /> orientation of the AST wells, the presence of free product in MW-5, or a combination of <br /> ' both It is also possible the local domestic wells located west of this property are <br /> influencing the gradients at the site <br /> A domestic well survey within 2,000 feet of the site was completed on August 16, 2000 <br /> The survey efforts resulted in the identification of numerous domestic wells on the <br /> residential properties to the southwest, west and northwest of the site Ten wells were <br /> located in the properties to the immediate west of the subject site and their locations are <br /> N identified in our "Well Receptor Report" dated September 11, 2000, (submitted to the SJC- <br /> PHS/EHD and the CRWQCB-CVR) <br /> ' 2.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On June 19, 2002, Don Light of Del Tech Geotechnical Support arrived on-site, opened the <br /> ' wells and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> watei level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot <br /> The wells were then purged of at least 3 well volumes of stagnant water using a centrifugal <br /> ' pump Purging continued until the temperature, conductivity and pH of the groundwater <br /> had stabilized (<10% variation among three readings) indicating that formation water <br /> representative of aquifer conditions was entering the well These water quality parameters <br /> ' were measured at intervals of each well volume purged The logs are included in Appendix <br /> C <br /> A stainless steel bailer or dedicated Wattera gibing was used to collect a sample from each <br /> ' well Care was taken to minimize sample agitation from the initial filling of the bailer to the <br /> transfer of the sample to the VOA vial and glass amber liter bottles Once the sample <br /> container was filled and capped, the bottle was then inverted, tapped and checked for <br /> ' headspace bubbles The sample container was then identified and labeled with a unique <br /> designation, inserted into foam holders and placed in an ice chest cooled to 4°C for <br /> transport to the laboratory <br /> ' All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a steam cleaner before <br /> and between uses Disposable gloves were used by the technician to collect all samples and <br /> were changed after each sample was collected <br /> I <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.