Laserfiche WebLink
Addendum to Work Plan September 13, 1989 <br /> Former Texaco Service Station, Manteca, California AGS 3$053-2 <br /> r� <br /> other pertinent site features, are shown on the Generalized Site Pian, Plate P-2. The <br /> samples were collected with a hand-operated percussion sampler, which we used to drive <br /> a clean brass sleeve into the native soil beneath the locations of the former lines. Each <br /> sleeve was removed from the sampler and promptly sealed with aluminum foil, plastic caps, <br /> and tape. The samples then were labeled and placed in iced storage. The field geologist <br /> initiated a Chain of Custody Record and accompanied the samples to the analytical <br /> laboratory. A copy of this record is attached to this addendum. <br /> The samples were analyzed at Mobile Chem Labs, Inc., of Lafayette, California, which is <br /> certified by the State of California to perform the analyses requested (Hazardous Waste <br /> Testing Laboratory Certificate No. 195). The samples were analyzed for total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline and diesel by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) <br /> modified Method 8015 and for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylene isomers <br /> (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020. The results of analyses are summarized in Table 1 and <br /> indicate that no detectable hydrocarbon contamination exists in the soil sample collected <br /> from between the former tank cavity and dispenser islands. TPH as diesel was detected. <br /> however, at 6,900 parts per million (ppm) and TAH as gasoline at 10 ppm beneath the <br /> former dispenser islands. <br /> These results indicate that treatment of contaminated soil beneath the former dispensers <br /> W' is necessary at this site. We propose that the contaminated soil beneath the dispenser <br /> islands be removed by excavation, in conjunction with the re-excavation of the former tank <br /> cavity, which is described in our work plan. Excavation beneath the former dispensers <br /> should proceed vertically to the extent of hydrocarbon contamination or to the ground- <br /> water surface(approximately 23 feet below grade). The horizontal extent of contamination <br /> should be limited to the north and south by the lack of subjective evidence of hydrocarbon <br /> contamination or by the site building and sidewalk. The excavation should proceed to the <br /> limits of subjective evidence of soil contamination related to the former dispensers to the <br /> east and west. The approximate limits of the proposed excavation are shown on Plate P- <br /> 2 <br /> Mobile Chem Labs will be onsite to verify the condition of the base and sidewalls at the <br /> limits of the excavation and to analyze one soil sample for approximately every 25 cubic <br /> yards of soil that is removed by excavation as stated in our work plan. Laboratory analyses <br /> and sampling methods will be performed as we proposed in our work plan. After receiving <br /> analytical results of the soil removed by excavation, we will evaluate alternatives to treat <br /> or dispose of the soil. If aeration is chosen, we will contact the San Joaquin Air Pollution <br /> Control District for authorization to proceed within aeration requirements. <br /> If soil samples collected._at._the_..limits-.of-.the--excavation-indicate--that-soil--contamination — --- ---- <br /> remains in the subsurface, Applied GeoSystems recommends that a feasibility study be <br /> conducted to evaluate the most appropriate method to mitigate the soil. <br /> -- 2 <br /> AV <br /> pA901 GeaSystems -- <br />