Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> KL E/NFEL DER <br /> Bright People.R,9ht5111tp s. <br /> 2 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING <br /> 2.1 FIELD INVESTIGATION <br /> On April 9, 2020, percolation test holes P-1 and P-2 were drilled adjacent the existing leach field <br /> area to depths of about 6 and 23 feet below site grade, respectively. The approximate percolation <br /> test hole locations are presented on Figure 2. Following drilling, the sides of the test holes were <br /> scored, and significant loose material was removed from the bottom of the holes. The percolation <br /> test holes were then prepared by first placing about 2 inches of fine gravel at the bottom of the <br /> holes and installing a 4-inch diameter, perforated PVC pipe. Before 10:00 AM on April 9, 2020, <br /> about 6 inches of water was placed in the holes for pre-soaking. On April 10, 2020,the percolation <br /> test for test hole P-1 was started at about 11:03 AM and at about 2:00 PM for percolation test <br /> hole P-2 in accordance with San Joaquin Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD) accepted <br /> guidelines, using clear potable water. The holes did not exhibit sloughing or caving and were <br /> empty of water prior to testing. From a fixed reference point (a marked location on the side of <br /> PVC pipe), the drop in water level was measured in approximate 30-minute intervals for 4 hours <br /> (SJCEHD Procedure #2) in percolation test hole P-1, refilling as necessary to maintain the <br /> prescribed amount of water over the gravel. Percolation test hole P-2 drained more rapidly and <br /> was measured in approximately 10-minute intervals for 1 hour (SJCEHD Procedure #3). Under <br /> the observation of a representative from the SJCEHD, the last 30- and 10-minute readings of the <br /> tests were observed and the percolation rates, in minutes per inch, were calculated. Copies of <br /> our field percolation test results are attached on Figure 5. <br /> The percolation test holes were located in the field by visual sighting and/or pacing from existing <br /> site features; therefore, the locations shown on Figure 2 should be considered approximate. <br /> 2.2 LABORATORY TESTING <br /> A laboratory test on a water sample recovered from the on-site well neared the proposed septic <br /> system modification area were performed by Fruit Growers Laboratory (FGL). The following <br /> laboratory tests were assigned. <br /> Nitrate (N) <br /> The water sample obtained from the well was delivered to a laboratory on ice the same day using <br /> chain-of-custody procedures. Laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. <br /> 20210068.001A/ST020R110989 Page 3 of 14 April 30, 2020 <br /> ©2020 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com <br />