My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006738 CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1001
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0545914
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006738 CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 10:28:36 PM
Creation date
8/4/2020 11:13:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006738 CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545914
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0000421
FACILITY_NAME
DINO MART
STREET_NUMBER
1001
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1001 E YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> . 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> On June 8, 2001, Ramage Environmental monitored and sampled groundwater at the site <br /> ' 21 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> ' Depth-to-groundwater was measured in all four groundwater monitoring wells to evaluate <br /> groundwater flow and gradient characteristics The depth to the groundwater table, ranged from <br /> 19 81 feet below ground surface (bgs) in MW-1 to 20 93 feet bgs in MW-4 The corresponding <br /> ' groundwater surface elevation ranged from a high of 17 71 feet above mean sea level (msl) at <br /> MW-1 to a low of 16 93 feet msl at MW-4 A different well construction for MW-2 may cause the <br /> t groundwater elevation in this well to be incompatible with the elevations in the three other wells <br /> The resulting groundwater surface appears as a regular plane dipping to the northeast at a <br /> gradient of approximately 0 00877 foot/foot A groundwater surface contour map is included as <br /> ' Figure 3 The well construction details, wellhead elevations and groundwater monitoring data are <br /> summarized in Table 1 <br /> ' 22 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis <br /> Following the groundwater level measurements, each of the four wells was purged and sampled <br /> The wells were purged using a pump and disposable tubing until at least three well casing <br /> ' volumes were extracted and/or after groundwater temperature, pH and electrical conductivity <br /> values had stabilized <br /> ' Following well purging and recharge, groundwater was sampled from the monitoring wells using <br /> dedicated disposable bailers and laboratory-supplied containers A groundwater sample was also <br /> ' collected from the on-site water supply well, after allowing the water to run for approximately 15 <br /> minutes <br /> ' Each sample was labeled, packaged in an iced cooler and transported with chain-of-custody <br /> documentation to Kiff Analytical, LLC (Kiff), a state certified hazardous waste testing laboratory <br /> (Certification #2236) Kiff analyzed each of the groundwater samples for Total Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbons (TPH)-as-gasoline, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX), MTBE, di- <br /> isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary <br /> ' butanol (TBA), and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) by EPA Method 8260B <br /> 5 <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.