Laserfiche WebLink
5.0 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS <br /> Figure 26 is map of the site area showing the locations of near-surface utility lines, <br /> primarily water and sewer Imes These utilities are usually burled at shallow depths <br /> (generally 5-10 feet), and have therefore been above the saturated zone since groundwater <br /> morutormg began at this site Should the groundwater level rise to less than 10 feet at some <br /> time in the future, it is conceivable that groundwater could enter the utility trenches <br /> However, the water and sewer lines along Acacia Street are both upgradient of the site, and <br /> it is therefore unlikely that these lines could become contaminated (the upgradient monitor <br /> well, MW-3, has only rarely contained detectable concentrations of hydrocarbons) Utility <br /> lines on the west side of Yosemite Street have probably never been contaminated, because <br /> no contan-unants have ever been detected in MW-6 and concentrations have been low <br /> and/or declining in MW-1 and MW-5 The only potential near-source receptor might be the <br /> house directly north of the site <br /> Upgradient reviewed the water well files at the California Department of Water Resources <br /> in Sacramento Table 5 lists four wells that have been drilled within approximately 2000 <br /> feet from the site The wells are also shown on the map in Figure 27 It is unlikely that any <br /> of them could be impacted by migration from the Conrady site for three reasons 1)they are <br /> all quite far away, 2) the plume appears to be shrinking rather than migrating, and 3) the <br /> one well that is located downgradient of the site was abandoned in 1967 <br /> Two surface water bodies are also located within 2000 feet of the site (Figure 27) However, <br /> the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel is upgradient of the site, and Yosemite Lake is more <br /> than 1700 feet downgradient The groundwater plume would certainly be diluted to non- <br /> detectable levels long before it could reach the lake <br /> Based on our review, we consider the potential risk to groundwater receptors to be very <br /> small <br /> 6.0 NO FURTHER ACTION <br /> Appendix B of the Tri-Regional Recommendations specifies four conditions that must be <br /> met in order to designate a site as a low-risk groundwater case <br /> 1) Contaminants remaining in the vadose zone must not reverse or threaten to <br /> reverse the mass reduction rate of groundwater pollutants <br /> 2)Separate phase product has been removed to the extent practicable <br /> 3)No existing water supply wells, deeper aquifers, surface waters or other <br /> receptors are threatened by pollutants remaining in the aquifer <br /> 4) The total pollutant mass remaining in the groundwater is decreasing at predicted <br /> rates and neither creates, nor threatens to create, a risk to human health and safety <br /> or future beneficial use(s) of the aquifer <br /> 9 <br />