My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006328
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1002
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545915
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006328
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 10:17:01 PM
Creation date
8/4/2020 2:25:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006328
RECORD_ID
PR0545915
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0025964
FACILITY_NAME
CONRADY PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
1002
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1002 N YOSEMITE AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
during these tests Clearwater reported that induced vacuums were measurable at <br /> monitoring points up to 40 feet from the SVE wells and induced pressures could be <br /> measured up to 55 feet away from sparge wells Hydrocarbon vapors were obtained from <br /> both SVE wells, and concentrations increased by at least 100%during the spargmg test <br /> 2.3 Site Remediation <br /> In 1996, after the feasibility testing was completed, Clearwater submitted a Corrective <br /> Action Plan to use soil vapor extraction and air sparging to remediate the site The plan was <br /> approved by EHD, and Clearwater prepared a cost proposal for tlus method The proposal <br /> was rejected by the State UST Cleanup Fund as being too expensive, and this plan was <br /> abandoned <br /> In subsequent correspondence to Mrs Conrady, PHS/EHD suggested the downhole <br /> application of Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) as a less-expensive alternative method of <br /> site remediation Regenests, Inc , the manufacturer of ORC, used the laboratory data <br /> supplied by Clearwater and calculated that 1,000 pounds of ORC powder would be required <br /> to successfully remediate the groundwater contamination Clearwater then submitted a <br /> second Corrective Action Plan in August 1997, proposing mjection of the ORC slurry into <br /> ten Geoprobe bonngs A cost estimate for this method was also rejected by the UST <br /> Cleanup Fund as being too expensive, and Mrs Conrady was instructed to seek competitive <br /> bids for the work Then, in written correspondence in January 1998, David Deaner of the <br /> UST Fund further instructed Mrs Conrady to reduce the number of borings by half, <br /> necessitating a concomitant reduction in the amount of ORC powder <br /> 2.3.1 ORC Infection and Monitoring <br /> Upgradient Environmental Consultants responded to a solicitation for bids in January 1998 <br /> The solicitation requested estimates to inject 500 pounds of ORC into five borings <br /> Upgradient's estimate was approved by the UST Fund in February 1998 After reviewing <br /> the previous work by GeoAudit and Clearwater, Upgradient prepared a revised CAP <br /> proposing injection into 7 Geoprobes (Figure 7) Tlus plan was approved by PHS/EHD in <br /> March 1998 <br /> The injection borings were drilled in April 1998 The borings ranged in depth from 20 to 35 <br /> feet, and injection occurred within a 10-foot interval in each boring (Figure 8) Injection <br /> volumes ranged from 11 to 55 gallons of slurry, for a total of 271 gallons Dissolved oxygen <br /> concentrations were measured in all of the existing wells and groundwater samples were <br /> collected from each well to establish a baseline for future monitoring of these parameters <br /> Dissolved oxygen concentrations were monitored in two 3-month periods m 1998, and <br /> groundwater samples were collected quarterly in accordance with the CAP Upon <br /> completion of the approved scope of work, PHS/EHD requested Upgradient to prepare a <br /> Closure Report summarizing the investigation and remediation of the site <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.