Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> trough to the low permeability of the pavement, which was previously thought to 1),. the <br /> cause of the trough <br /> 3.2 Dissolved Oxygen <br /> A portable dissolved oxygen sensor was used to measure the concentration in percent DO <br /> and in milligrams per liter (mg/1) during purging The dissolved oxygen data are shown in <br /> Appendix A, and final readings at the conclusion of purging are tabulated in Tables 2 and 3 <br /> and plotted against time in Figure 4 Concentrations were less than 1% in most we Its in <br /> November, and were 0% in all wells except VW-1 in December This indicates that CRC is <br /> no longer releasing oxygen to the groundwater <br /> 3.3 Hydrocarbons <br /> Eight to ten gallons of water were purged from each monitoring well before sample., were <br /> collected in December During purging, the pH, temperature, conductivity, and dis,,-)lved <br /> oxygen concentrations of the extracted water were measured with a Corning meter to insure <br /> that water samples would be representative of unaltered groundwater (Appendix A) To <br /> prevent cross-contamination from MW-2 to the more distant wells, MW-2 was purge d and <br /> sampled last The water purged from the wells was stored on site in a 55-gallon drum The <br /> sparging wells were purged of only 2 gallons before they went dry Gasoline odors were <br /> noted in MW-2 and in the vapor extraction and sparging wells <br /> Samples were collected from all ten wells using dedicated disposable bailers We noted that <br /> the bailers in MW-2 and SW-1 have become discolored over the past several month,,, as a <br /> result of being in contact with contamtnted groundwater in these wells The samples were <br /> poured into sterilized vials, labeled,placed in a cooled ice chest, and transported to Sc quota <br /> Analytical Laboratories for hydrocarbon analysis Laboratory data are summarized in fable <br /> 4 The full laboratory report is included in Appendix B <br /> The laboratory irntially reported that MTBE was detected at a concentration of 15 ppb in <br /> MW-1 Because this sample was the first one analyzed by the laboratory, and because no <br /> MTBE or other oxygenates had previously been detected in any of the wells, Upgradient <br /> requested the laboratory to re-run this sample As suspected, no MTBE was detected in the <br /> re-run sample, implying that the initial detection was due to carryover from a previous <br /> sample and incomplete cleaning of laboratory equipment (Appendix B) None of the <br /> oxygenates were detected in any of the other wells <br /> There has been little change in the concentration of gasoline in MW-2 since ORC ink,etion � <br /> (Table 4) The concentration has fluctuated between 37,000 and 27,000 ppb throughcut the 30 <br /> year On the other hand, benzene and toluene have declined noticeably, while ethylbeiizene <br /> and xylene have risen This could indicate that benzene and toluene have degraded , <br /> somewhat, leading to the production of less volatile compounds like xylene Sim,larly, <br /> gasoline concentrations have remained high in SW-1, and have even increased (Figure 5), <br /> while benzene concentrations have declined significantly (Figure 6) <br /> 16 <br /> 3 <br />