Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> ti <br /> 4.0 MONITORING PROCEDURES AND RESULTS <br /> 4.1 Depth to Groundwater <br /> The depth to groundwater in each well was measured on April 24 and again on May 8, and the <br /> • depths were recorded on the Well Monitor Report (Appendix A) Depths were measured with <br /> a Sohnst water level sounder to an accuracy of 0 01 foot In order to utilize water depth data <br /> from the spargmg and vapor extraction wells, Upgradient requested and obtained approval <br /> from PHS/EHD to survey the site and measure the elevations of the well casings in these wells, <br /> which had not been previously done The wells were surveyed on May 8 <br /> Water level and casing elevation data are tabulated in Table I and were used in constructing <br /> groundwater gradient maps for both days (Figures 8 and 9) The maps are similar in <br /> appearance, and indicate that the water table has a natural slope to the northeast of <br /> approximately 0 008 ft/ft from SW-2 to MW-4 Tlus natural gradient appears to be affected by <br /> • the presence of Yosemite Street to the west of the site, however, causing a flexure in the <br /> gradient contours and forming a groundwater "low" beneath the surface of the street We <br /> interpret this flexure in the gradient as the result of differential groundwater recharge, caused <br /> by the impervious asphalt surface of the street relative to the bare ground that is present on the <br /> Conrady property Unable to penetrate the street's surface to the same extent as the natural <br /> ground surface, groundwater is 0 4 feet deeper beneath the center of the street than would be <br /> anticipated by projecting the gradient contours along the same northwest trend that is observed <br /> on the Conrady property <br /> 4,2 Hydrocarbons <br /> • <br /> On the morrung of April 24, prior to injection of the ORC, groundwater samples were <br /> collected for laboratory analysis of hydrocarbon concentrations Prior to sampling, all six <br /> monitoring wells and both sparging wells were purged, but the sparging wells pumped dry very <br /> quickly and were slow to recharge due to ther small screened interval Hence, the vapor <br /> extraction wells were not pumped prior to sampling, because, like the sparging wells, they have <br /> very short screen intervals in the saturated zone and were likely to pump dry, making sample <br /> collection more difficult Twelve to fifteen gallons (approximately 3 casing volumes) were <br /> purged from each well, and pH, temperature, and conductivity were measured with a Corning <br /> meter to insure that these parameters stabilized prior to sampling (Appendix A) Several of the <br /> wells exhibited strong gasoline odors, so after purging each well, the purge pump was <br /> immersed in soapy water and the water was pumped through the hoses for several minutes in <br /> an effort to prevent cross-contamination between wells A total of 220 gallons of purged water <br /> are now stored on site in four 55-gallon drums <br /> Samples were collected from each well, including the air sparging and vapor extraction wells, <br /> which had not been previously sampled Samples were collected in sterilized vials preserved <br /> • 4 <br />