My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006639
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1012
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545948
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006639
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 10:19:50 PM
Creation date
8/5/2020 4:06:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006639
RECORD_ID
PR0545948
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005159
FACILITY_NAME
FILL-EM FAST
STREET_NUMBER
1012
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
21903024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1012 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Brian Cobb <br /> August 29, 1995 <br /> ' Page 2 <br /> SVE Pilot Tests <br /> ' Two separate SVE pilot tests were performed on Site on May 1, 1995 Wells MW-5 and <br /> MW-2 were used as test wells for the SVE pilot tests (Figure 1) For each test, the unlet to <br /> ' the Rotron brand blower was connected to the test well via a 2-inch-diameter flexible hose <br /> The outlet of the blower was connected to two 55-gallon granular activated carbon (GAC) <br /> canisters, arranged in series, also using flexible hose. The blower was powered using a <br /> portable 240-volt, 3-phase generator. The flow rate for the blower was measured using a <br /> pitot-type magnehelic flow meter Vacuum measurements at the observation well heads were <br /> measured using an oil manometer capable of reading both vacuum and pressure Field <br /> 11' records collected during the pilot tests are attached The following describes the procedures <br /> followed during each of the tests. <br /> ' Well MW-5 SVE Pilot Test. This SVE pilot test was conducted over a 2-112-hour period. <br /> The flow rate at the well was started at 20 cubic feet per minute (cfm) and incrementally <br /> increased to 40 cfm, then to 50 cfm, at approximately 75-minute intervals However, at <br /> ' three different periods during the test, the blower shut down due to overheating The blower <br /> was off for approximately 30 minutes each time. The blower was allowed to operate at a <br /> maximum rate of approximately 50 cfm for approximately 75 minutes The maximum <br /> vacuum sustained at Well MW-1 during this test was 52 inches of water at a flow rate of <br /> 50 cfm A portable photo-ionization detector (PID) was used to monitor concentrations of <br /> volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the vapor effluent and monitor the GAC units for <br /> breakthrough during the test. Vacuum, flow rate, and VOC concentrations for the test well <br /> and resulting vacuum measurements recorded at the monitoring well heads are presented in <br /> Table 1. <br /> Well MW-2 SVE Pilot Test The second SVEilot test was run for approximately <br /> Y <br /> 45 minutes The flow rate at the well was held constant at 20 cfm throughout the duration <br /> of the test The maximum vacuum sustained at Well MW-2 during this test was 98 inches <br /> of water Vacuum and flow rate measurements and VOC concentrations (as measured with <br /> the PID) measured in the test well, and resulting vacuum measurements,recorded at the <br /> monitoring well heads are presented in Table 1 <br /> r , <br /> In addition to the measurements collected during the two SVE pilot tests, one vapor sample <br /> was collected from Well MW-5 at the end of the fust pilot test The sample was collected <br /> using a vacuum pump connected to a sample tap located near the well head, downstream of <br /> �I the flow meter and upstream of the first GAC The sample was stored in a dry cooler until <br /> being submitted to Air Toxics LTD , a State of California Department of Toxic Substances'I i <br /> Control certified analytical-laboratory. The sample was analyzed for the presence of total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPHg) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene <br /> I 08!17/9516 VJLn156RI565-6T1.TR-01 WP51 <br /> r HpLmwr1Ap <br /> II I t <br /> , <br /> ' Brown andValdwell <br /> 'Cons'ultants <br /> r I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.