Laserfiche WebLink
r , <br /> Addendum To Closure Report- Chevron Station#9-1848 <br /> July 9, 1999 <br /> 4 Appendix A and Appendix B of the Closure Report Include tabulated soil and groundwater <br /> chemical analytical data, respectively <br /> 5 TPHg and benzene Isoconcentration maps (Figures 5 through 8) that indicate Impacted soil <br /> remaining in place in the vicinity of the former gasoline USTs, dispenser Islands, and the current <br /> gasoline USTs are attached Hydrocarbon Impact was not encountered in off-site borings Vertical <br /> extent of hydrocarbon Impact beneath the site is depicted on Figure 4 Areas of impact were <br /> defined from 3 to 9 feet bgs (dispenser islands and former waste oil UST), 16 to 25 feet bgs <br /> (former fuel UST pit), and 18 to 25 feet bgs (current fuel UST pit) <br /> 6 Mass balance calculations for TPHg and benzene in soil are attached Approximately 814 pounds <br /> (lbs) of TPHg, and 1 7 lbs of benzene remain in the soil beneath the site Approximately 0 7 Ibs <br /> of dissolved TPHg,0 007 lbs of benzene, and 0 27 lbs of MtBE remain in the groundwater beneath <br /> the site <br /> 7 Clean-up efforts were limited to source removal GR's Closure Report discusses remediation <br /> activities and effectiveness in sections VI and VIII, "Rational For Closure " <br /> 8 Engineered remediation was not undertaken at this site <br /> 9, 10 Reasons why "background" was not attained and the rationale why groundwater conditions will <br /> not be adversely affected are discussed in the Sign Off sections of GR's Closure Report, section <br /> VIII <br /> Based upon the data presented in GR's Closure Report and the information provided above, it is our <br /> opinion that no further action is warranted and this site should be closed There does not appear to be a <br /> threat to human health from contaminants that remain in place beneath the site Groundwater impact <br /> appears limited to the area beneath the subject site only <br /> At the request of SJCPHS, GR investigated one domestic supply well and one municipal supply well in the <br /> vicinity of the subject site These wells were identified as the closest sensitive receptors that could be <br /> impacted by the dissolved hydrocarbon plume GR was able to contact and discuss the condition of the <br /> wells with their owners According to the property owner of the domestic well located 0 1-mile northeast <br /> of the site (well ID #1, Figure 1, in the Closure Report), a domestic supply well does not exist, nor has <br /> ever existed at this location City of Manteca municipal well#4, located approximately 0 5-mile northeast <br /> of the site (well ID #2, Figure 1, in the Closure Report), has been out-of-service (inactive) for 5 years <br /> Ms Dianne Martin, Water Quality Engineer for the City of Manteca Public Works Department (PWD) <br /> indicated the PWD will not activate or allow access into the wellhead for collection of a water sample <br /> 346392 02 <br />