My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006211
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1257
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545949
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 10:14:59 PM
Creation date
8/6/2020 9:50:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006211
RECORD_ID
PR0545949
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003707
FACILITY_NAME
AHMEDS SONS INC
STREET_NUMBER
1257
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20015015
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1257 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Closure Report - Chevron Station#9-1848 <br /> January 18, 1999 - - <br /> ppm) and benzene (0 010 ppm), and the soil sample from well boring C-2 at 16 feet bgs <br /> contained TPHg (13 ppm) and benzene (0 11 ppm) also These borings appear to define the <br /> lateral and vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil beneath the site <br /> Furthermore, soil samples from the four off-site soil borings did not contain detectable <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons, thus delineating the soil cast, northeast, noith, and west of the site <br /> Groundwater impacted by petioleum hydrocarbons appears to be confined to wells C-1 and <br /> C-2 Moreover, it appears the groundwater plume has not migrated off-site and is stable as <br /> evidenced by the grab gioundwater samples collected from borings 13-1 through B-4 <br /> Based on these data, additional investigation or remediation of soil or groundwater is not <br /> wai ranted, and the site should be closed In support of the closure request, we summai ize the <br /> infoimation requested in Appendix B of the CRWQCB Request For Closure guidelines This <br /> information is presented point by point as outlined in the document <br /> I Background history of the case <br /> The case history is Summarized above <br /> • II Investigative methods <br /> Based on our review of available documentation, work performed at the site to date <br /> appears to have followed the appropriate San Joaquin County Department of Public <br /> Health Services (SJCDPHS) and RWQCB guidelines foi the investigation and <br /> remediation of hydrocarbon-impacted sites, and the accepted methods and practices in <br /> general use at the time the work was performed <br /> III Extent of soil and groundwatei pollution <br /> The lateral and vertical extent of hydrocarbon impact has been defined Impacted soil <br /> from the former gasoline UST pit, associated product lines, waste oil UST, hydraulic <br /> lifts and fluid tank, grease traps, and oil water separator had been excavated until only <br /> low levels of petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were left in place Approximately <br /> 960 cubic yards of soil was transpoited to Forward Landfill in Stockton, California <br /> Appi oximately 30 cubic yards of soil containing waste oil were transpoi ted to Browning <br /> Ferris Industries in Livermore, California Approximately 450 cubic yards of soil were <br /> used to backfill the former UST excavation <br /> Impacted groundwater appears confined to on-site wells C-1 and C-2 Free-phase <br /> hydrocarbons have never been measured or observed in the any of the thiee wells at this <br /> • 346302 02-0 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.