Laserfiche WebLink
SiteHisto <br /> Jackpot Food po <br /> acod ilAart, 1434 W Yosemite Ave,Manteca,CA <br /> Time all Property No 04167 <br /> The results of the survey suggested that Impacted soils were limited to the area of the north pump Island <br /> and did not extend laterally to any great degree A copy of the Canonie's "Soil Vapor Survey Report with <br /> Proposed Boring and Well Locations"was forwarded to the PHS/EHD and CRWQCB on September 24, <br /> 1992 <br /> During the week of October 5, 1992, a drill rig was utilized to install 4 groundwater monitoring wells and 3 <br /> vadose zone vapor extraction wells in the vicinity of the former tanks During field activities, soils were <br /> found to consist of loose fine to medium sands to a depth of approximately 15 feet This strata was <br /> underlain by a 1-foot to 4-foot thick layer of stiff silty clay which appeared to act as an aquitard (15 to 19 <br /> feet below ground surface) Just below the clay unit, saturated sands/silty sands were encountered, <br /> while moist silty clays were encountered at 30 feet <br /> Wells W1, W2, and W4 were constructed as vadose zone extraction wells Each of these wells was <br /> installed to a depth 15 feet and screened from a depth of 5 feet to the extent of the well with 4-inch <br /> diameter, 0 020-inch slotted well screen Because it was thought that the first clay unit represented a <br /> possible aquitard, monitoring wells W3, W5, W6, and W7 were constructed to insure that contamination <br /> to the groundwater did not occur through the creation of a vertical conduit Accordingly, W5, W6, and <br /> W7 were completed as 30-foot monitoring wells, screened from a depth of 20 feet to the extent of the <br /> well with 2-inch diameter 0 020-inch slotted casing Due to its potential for use in a pumping system, W3 <br /> was constructed with 4-inch diameter casing and screened similarly to the 2-inch wells <br /> Two to three soil samples from each boring were transported to an analytical laboratory and analyzed for <br /> TPH, BTEX, and ethylene dibromide Gasoline and xylenes were present at 100 ppm and 2 ppm, <br /> respectively, in the sample collected from W2 at a depth of 5 feet, however, no contaminants were <br /> detected at a depth of 15 feet Samples collected from W4 at a depths of 5 feet and 10 feet contained <br /> 26 ppm and 290 ppm gasoline, as well as ethylbenzene and xylenes However, soil samples collected <br /> from W3 (installed adjacent to W4) contained only 0 71 ppm gasoline and trace BTEX constituents at a <br /> depth of 14 feet, while no contaminants were found at 20 feet None of the other samples contained <br /> detectable concentrations of gasoline or BTEX <br /> On November 5, the groundwater wells were developed and sampled Prior to purging, an east- <br /> southeasterly gradient was determined by measuring the depth to groundwater in each well The sample <br /> collected from W3 was found to contain 0 55 ppb xylenes, however, no contaminants were detected in <br /> the remaining samples <br /> After the installation of the wells, a vapor extraction pilot test was performed on W1, W2, and W4 to <br /> evaluate the feasibility of in-situ remediation by vapor extraction The results of the study indicated that <br /> soil vapors can be easily extracted from the existing wells and that this technology appears appropriate <br /> for site remediation <br /> Based on the results of the site assessment and previous investigations, it appears that the extent of <br /> gasoline-impacted soil is well defined and remains limited to the area of the pump islands Although <br /> trace concentrations of xylenes were present in the groundwater sample collected from W4, the levels <br /> indicated were far below California's primary drinking water quality standards (1750 ppb for xylenes) <br /> A copy of Canonie Environmental's "Site Assessment Report" was forwarded to the PHS/EHD and <br /> CRWQCB on May 26, 1993 In their reply dated June 24, 1994, the PHS/EHD requested that additional <br /> borings be placed to determine the extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soils and that the groundwater <br /> monitoring wells on the subject site be re-sampled <br /> 2 <br />