Laserfiche WebLink
At the request of the PHS/EHD, three soil samples collected from the bottom of each boring were <br /> submitted to GTEL Environmental Laboratories, Inc in Wichita, Kansas, for analysis of total <br /> organic carbon (TOC) by Method CFA 18 0 (California Fertilizer Association, Soil Testing <br /> Procedures for California, CFA-SIC Publication, 1980) In addition, three soil samples were <br /> submitted to Remediation Technology Testing Facility for geotechnical soil properties by EPA <br />' Method 415 1, for the following parameters air permeability, total porosity, coarse grain size <br /> analysis, bulk density, and moisture content Analytical reports are included in Appendix C <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION FOR CLOSURE <br /> The facility at the site has been operating as a gasoline station since 1969 In September 1991, the <br /> underground storage tanks (USTs) and associated piping were removed from the site as part of a <br /> facility upgrade Laboratory analytical results of soil samples collected during the tank removal <br /> activities reported detectable concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, and ethylene dibromide (EDB) <br /> Analytical results of soil samples collected during the tank removal are presented in Table 3 <br />' Based on these results, an assessment was conducted at the site in August 1992 which included a <br /> soil gas survey, drilling and soil sampling of seven soil borings, and converting four of the bonngs <br /> into groundwater monitor/extraction wells and three of the borings into soil vapor extraction wells <br />' A soil vapor extraction pilot test was subsequently performed on the vapor extraction wells A copy <br /> of the tank pull report prepared by Canome Environmental (Canonise) was forwarded to the office <br /> of PHS/EHD on December 17, 1991 A copy of the site assessment report prepared by Canome was <br /> forwarded on May 26, 1993 Based on the PHS/EHD's June 24, 1993 reply, an additional <br /> investigation was implemented by Science & Engineering Analysis Corporation (SEACOR) in <br /> December 1993 Site activities included the advancement of four verification borings to define the <br />' limit of hydrocarbon impacted soils and re-sampling the groundwater monitor wells A Problem <br /> Assessment Report was prepared by SECOR on May 31, 1994 <br />' On August 26, 1994, a Final Remedial Plan (FRP) prepared by SECOR was submitted to the <br /> PHS/EHD for public notification and regulatory approval Before the FRP could be implemented, <br /> the State Water Resources Control Board, prompted by a study conducted by Lawrence Livermore <br />' National Laboratory, issued a statement suggesting that intrinsic bioremediation should be <br /> considered an acceptable remedial option in "low risk" cases Based on this information and <br /> discussions with the PHS/EHD, Time Oil Company authorized SECOR to present the results of the <br /> recent subsurface investigation, verifying that petroleum hydrocarbons in soil at the site are <br /> degrading by natural processes <br /> IThe four groundwater monitor wells at the site have been gauged and sampled rune times since <br /> November 5, 1992 Historical ground water level measurements are presented in Table 4 Over this <br /> period, depth to ground water at the site has ranged from 12 92 (W-5, May 1995) to 17 42 (W-6, <br />' July 1994) The analytical results for ground water samples in monitor wells W-3, W-5, W-6, and <br /> W-7, have consistently been below the method detection limit for TPHg and benzene (since the <br /> wells were installed) The only historical ground water samples reported with petroleum <br /> SECOR <br /> 14341NV RPT <br /> J0710-002-01 3 Oc[a6cr 9 1996 <br /> 1 <br />