Laserfiche WebLink
�r I <br /> sde History <br /> Jackpot Food Mart, 1434 W Yosemite Ave,Manteca CA <br /> Time Oil Property No 04167 <br /> The results of the survey suggested that Impacted soils were limited to the area of the north pump island <br /> and did not extend laterally to any great degree A copy of the Canonie s Soil Vapor Survey Report with <br /> Proposed Boring and Well Locations"was forwarded to the PHS/EHD and CRWQCB on September 24, <br /> 1992 <br /> During the week of October 5, 1992, a drill rig was utilized to Install 4 groundwater monitoring wells and 3 <br /> vadose zone vapor extraction wells in the vicinity of the former tanks During field activities, soils were <br /> found to consist of loose fine to medium sands to a depth of approximately 15 feet This strata was <br /> underlain by a 1-foot to 4-foot thick layer of stiff silty clay which appeared to act as an aquitard (15 to 19 <br /> feet below ground surface) Just below the clay unit, saturated sands/silty sands were encountered, <br /> while moist silty clays were encountered at 30 feet <br /> Wells W1, W2, and W4 were constructed as vadose zone extraction wells Each well was installed to a <br /> depth 15 feet and screened from a depth of 5 feet to the extent of the well with 4-inch diameter, 0 020- <br /> inch slotted well screen Wells W3, W5, W6, and W7 were installed as groundwater monitoring wells <br /> Because it was thought that the first clay unit represented a possible aquitard, these wells were <br /> constructed to Insure that contamination to the groundwater did not occur through the creation of a <br /> vertical conduit Accordingly, W5, W6, and W7 were completed as 30-foot monitoring wells, screened <br /> from a depth of 20 feet to the extent of the well with 2-Inch diameter 0 020-Inch slotted casing Due to its <br /> potential for use in a pumping system, W3 was constructed with 4-Inch diameter casing and screened <br /> similarly to the 2-inch wells <br /> Two to three soil samples from each boring were transported to an analytical laboratory and analyzed for <br /> • TPH, BTEX, and ethylene dibromide Gasoline and xylenes were indicated at 100 ppm and 2 ppm, <br /> respectively, in the sample collected from W2 at a depth of 5 feet, however, no contaminants were <br /> indicated at a depth of 15 feet Samples collected from W4 at a depths of 5 feet and 10 feet contained <br /> 26 ppm and 290 ppm gasoline, as well as ethylbenzene and xylenes However, soil samples collected <br /> from W3 (installed adjacent to W4) contained only 0 71 ppm gasoline and trace BTEX constituents at a <br /> depth of 14 feet, while no contaminants were found at 20 feet None of the other samples contained <br /> detectable concentrations of gasoline or BTEX <br /> On November 5, the groundwater wells were developed and sampled Prior to purging, an east- <br /> southeasterly gradient was determined by measuring the depth to groundwater in each well Analyses <br /> indicated the presence of 0 55 ppb xylenes in the sample collected from W3, however, no contaminants <br /> were detected in the remaining wells <br /> After the installation of the wells, a vapor extraction pilot test was performed on W1, W2, and W4 to <br /> evaluate the feasibility of in-situ remediation by vapor extraction The results of the study indicated that <br /> soil vapors can be easily extracted from the existing wells and that this technology appears appropriate <br /> for site remediation <br /> Based on the results of the site assessment and previous investigations, It appears that the extent of <br /> gasoline-impacted soil is well defined and remains limited to the area of the pump islands Although <br /> trace concentrations of xylenes were present in the groundwater sample collected from W4, the levels <br /> indicated were far below California's primary drinking water quality standards (1750 ppb for xylenes) <br /> A copy of Canome Environmental's "Site Assessment Report, Underground Storage Tank Site, Time Oil <br /> Co , Jackpot Food Mart, Manteca, California was forwarded to the PHS/EHD and CRWQCB on May 26, <br /> 1993 In their reply dated June 24, 1994, the PHSIEHD requested that additional borings be placed to <br /> • determine the extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soils and that the groundwater monitoring wells on the <br /> subject site be re-sampled <br /> 2 <br />