My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005987
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1434
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545950
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 2:12:40 AM
Creation date
8/6/2020 10:53:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005987
RECORD_ID
PR0545950
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003739
FACILITY_NAME
Colonial Energy CE 40134 (DBA Power Mart)
STREET_NUMBER
1434
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Manteca
Zip
95337
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1434 W Yosemite Ave
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> i{ <br /> Site History <br /> Jackpot Food Mart, 1434 W Yosemite Ave , Manteca, CA <br /> Time Oil Property No 04-167 <br /> Based on the results of the most recent sampling event, it did not appear as <br /> though the concentrations and distribution of hydrocarbons in groundwater changed <br /> significantly since the previous sampling event While trace toluene <br /> concentrations appeared in W-6 during the December 1993 groundwater sampling <br /> event, no hydrocarbons were indicated during the July sampling event <br /> Depth to groundwater decreased across the site by approximately one foot since <br /> the previous sampling event, and groundwater flow changed from east in December <br /> 1993 to northeast in July 1994 These changes may have been due to seasonal <br /> variations or local agricultural irrigation, however, not enough data has been <br /> collected to definitively determine the cause <br /> Suantary of Findings Pertinent to Selection of Remediation System <br /> Based on data collected to date, it appears that the extent of hydrocarbon- <br /> impacted soil is well defined and remains limited to the area of the pump islands <br /> and north portion of the former tank bed Groundwater beneath the site does not <br /> appear to have been significantly impacted by hydrocarbons <br /> Soils at the site generally consist of fine to medium sands to a depth of <br /> approximately 15 feet This strata is underlain by a clay unit which is <br /> approximately 5 feet thick Fine to medium sand is present from a depth of 20 <br /> feet to the extent of each boring Groundwater has generally been encountered <br /> at depths of 16 to 17 feet below ground surface and flow direction has varied <br /> from east-southeast (November 1992) to east (December 1993) to northeast (July <br /> 1994) <br /> To evaluate remedial options, a vapor extraction pilot test was conducted at the <br /> subject site in December 1992 Results indicated that vapor extraction would be <br /> a feasible remedial alternative for remediating impacted soils beneath the site <br /> Comparison of Remedial Alternatives <br /> SEACOR's "Problem Assessment Report" dated May 31, 1994, contained an evaluation <br /> of several remedial technologies for cleanup of impacted soils in the vicinity <br /> of the former tank system soil excavation and disposal, soil excavation and on- <br /> site aeration, soil excavation and off-site aeration, and in-situ soil vapor <br /> extraction <br /> Based on the excellent results achieved during the vapor extraction pilot test <br /> and the low cost of installing and operating such a system, other remedial <br /> methods involving excavation were not considered feasible for soil cleanup <br /> Vapor extraction is the least expensive option, it can achieve rapid results, and <br /> it will not disrupt the business currently in operation <br /> Selection of Remedial Technology <br /> Vapor extraction is the proposed remedial technology to achieve cleanup of <br /> hydrocarbon-impacted soils beneath the subject site It is estimated that 3 <br /> existing wells (W-1, W-2, and W-4) will be utilized for the proposed vapor <br /> extraction system In addition, horizontal wells may be installed within the <br /> vapor extraction piping trenches to enhance remediation if hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> soils are encountered during system installation Although a radius of influence <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.