My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005829 CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1711
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0545951
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005829 CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 3:21:27 AM
Creation date
8/6/2020 11:09:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005829 CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545951
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003612
FACILITY_NAME
Yosemite Avenue Arco AmPm
STREET_NUMBER
1711
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Manteca
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1711 E Yosemite Ave
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr Michael Infurna Project 20805-151-004 <br /> August 25, 2000 <br /> Page 2 <br /> UST REMOVAL ACTIVITIES <br /> On April 29, 1999, a Pinnacle geologist was on-site to observe the excavation and <br /> ' removal of the three USTs The USTs had been previously exposed, pumped dry, <br /> inerted with dry ice, and prepared for removal Randy Sutton of the City of Manteca <br /> Fire Department gave his approval to remove the USTs Michael Kith of the <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division (SJCEHD) was on-site to observe <br /> the removal activities The USTs appeared to be in good condition with no holes, cracks, <br /> or pitting observed Slight damage was observed on the ribbed section of USTs 1 and 2, <br /> both at approximately 6 feet from the fill end The damage appeared to be old and not <br /> done during the removal of the USTs UST 2 appeared to be slightly stained with <br /> gasoline from overfill at the fill end of the UST The USTs were transported by <br /> Fuller Excavation and Demolition of Rancho Cordova, California, to Erickson of <br /> Richmond, California, for disposal <br /> Four 4-inch-diameter observation wells, located in each corner of the northern UST <br /> complex were removed intact during the excavation activities The observation wells <br /> were replaced with two new 4-inch-diameter observation wells located in the northeast <br /> and southwest corners of the new UST complex The wells were screened from <br /> approximately 5 feet below ground surface (bgs) to the total depth of the UST complex <br /> (approximately 17 feet bgs) <br /> Groundwater encountered at the base (17 feet bgs) of the northern UST excavation was <br />' not sampled <br /> Stockpiled material (SP-2 through SP-6 and SP-10) from the UST complexes was <br /> sampled and analyzed, and the SJCEHD approved the material for use as backfill in the <br /> southern UST complex <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> On April 21, 1999 Pinnacle collected stockpile samples SP-1 (4-point sample) and SP-2 <br /> (two-point sample) from pea gravel and soil removed from the UST complexes In <br /> addition, samples T-1, T-2, and T-3 were collected from water removed from the three <br /> USTs Water samples were identified based on previous tank designations, however, <br />' UST designations were later modified by the SJCEHD representative as follows <br /> UST 1, 2, and 3 designations were changed to UST 2, 3, and 1, respectively Figure 1 <br /> shows the modified UST designations <br /> SAC 111SACRFPI ICOMMON1Consultmgldatz\Shared\Projects\PJ010805108051510 4zz doc-Mit I <br /> (804141 00008) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.