My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005843 CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1711
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0545951
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005843 CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 3:15:21 AM
Creation date
8/6/2020 11:16:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005843 CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545951
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003612
FACILITY_NAME
Yosemite Avenue Arco AmPm
STREET_NUMBER
1711
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Manteca
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1711 E Yosemite Ave
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> ff���� <br /> April 15, 1993 Working To Restore Nature <br /> ARCO Facility No 6020, Manteca, California <br /> SUMMARY <br /> i <br /> The following summarizes the findings gathered during this investigation and previous work <br /> that RESNA has performed at the site <br /> o Residual hydrocarbons were analytically identified in soil at low <br /> concentrations during the initial subsurface investigation (borings B-3 through <br /> B-6), but were not detected during the additional investigation in soil samples <br /> collected from borings B-8 through B-13 Therefore, residual hydrocarbons <br /> have been adequately delineated Because residual hydrocarbons were not <br /> detected in boring B-13, residual hydrocarbons initially detected from boring <br /> B-6 appears to be sporadic <br /> o The groundwater surface beneath the site in December 1992 was <br /> approximatel 28)Feet below grade The ground water flow direction was to <br /> the northwe with a hydraulic gradient of 0 014 <br /> o Dissolved gasoline hydrocarbons were not analytically identified in ground- <br /> water samples collected from each of the four monitoring wells <br /> o Nitrates were detected in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, and MW-4 <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> This report was prepared in accordance with generally accepted standards of environmental <br /> geological practice in California at the time this investigation was performed This <br /> investigation was conducted solely to evaluate environmental conditions of the soil and <br /> ground water with respect to hydrocarbons identified in soil during previous work No soil <br /> engineering or geotechnical recommendations are implied or should be inferred Evaluation <br /> of the geologic conditions at the site for the purpose of this investigation is made from a <br /> limited number of observation points Subsurface conditions may vary away from the data <br /> 30055-5 <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.