Laserfiche WebLink
CAL <br /> INC <br /> Corporate Office <br /> 2040 Peabody Road <br /> Suite <br /> Vacaville CA 95687 95687 <br /> 7071446 7996 <br /> FAX 707/446-4906 April 7, 1999 <br /> Van Nuys � <br /> 1999 <br /> 7949 Woodley Avenue Mr Chris Brown <br /> Suite 138 Project Engineer, Environmental Services <br /> Van Nuys CA 91406 J g l=NV1RO1Vti1FT,,I rq[ I-}EALTN <br /> 818/375 5071 ABF Freight System, Inc PF0M1TISrRVECE$ <br /> FAX 818/375 5051 P O Box 10048 <br /> Stockton Fort Smith, AR 72917-0048 <br /> 343 East Main Street <br /> Suite 404 <br /> Stockton CA 95202 RE; Report on the results of additional sampling of groundwater from three <br /> 2091942-2008 <br /> FAX 209/9442 2638 monitoring wells lls on March 19> 1994> at 2747 West Yosemite Avenue, s Manteca CA <br /> Petaluma Dear Mr Brown <br /> 599 Tomales Road <br /> Bldg 160 <br /> Petaluma CA 94952 On March 19, 1999, CAL INC collected a confirmatory round of groundwater samples from <br /> 7o7ns2 saga rY In' P <br /> FAX 707ns2 4088 the three monitoring wells installed at the site of a now-removed underground storage tank <br /> Indiana (UST) at your operations at 2747 West Yosemite Avenue, Manteca, CA This letter reports <br /> Grissom ARB IN 46791 the results of the analyses of these samples for the petroleum hydrocarbon parameters The <br /> 7651689 9053 results confirm that the UST removal site is eligible to be considered by San Joaquin County <br /> authorities for closure <br /> Genera!Construction <br />. BACKGROUND <br /> Environmental <br /> Remediation .A 10,000-gallon underground tank used to store diesel fuel was removed by CAL INC from <br /> 2747 West Yosemite Avenue, Manteca, CA (`the site', see Figure 1) on March 18, 1998 <br /> Environmental Groundwater and soil samples were collected from the UST excavation and excavation <br /> Engrnearrng stockpiles under the supervision of Messrs Michael Kith and Robert McClellan, Inspectors <br /> Environmental for the San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (SJCo <br /> Training PHS/EHD) Groundwater was intersected at a depth of 10 5 feet below grade in the 11-foot <br /> deep excavation It had an obvious oily sheen and a distinct petroleum hydrocarbon odor <br /> Environmental Petroleum hydrocarbon-stained soil was observed on the floor of the excavation The tank <br /> Database Tracking showed signs of leakage on the ends and had pitting on its underside <br /> The results of analysis of the soil and groundwater samples collected from the excavation <br /> and stockpile after UST removal are summarized in Table 1 below Two groundwater <br /> samples were collected from the floor of the excavation, one Just after the UST was removed <br /> (Sample Excavation 11'), the other after purging the groundwater(Sample Pit Water) Total <br /> Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel fuel (TPH-D) were detected in both samples (53 and 41 <br /> mg/L, respectively) Neither sample contained concentrations of benzene above the method <br /> detection limit However, the Pit Water sample contained concentrations of toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and xylenes above the method detection limits The two soils samples from <br /> the groundwater/soil interface in the wall of the UST excavation, and the sample from below <br /> the diesel fuel dispenser, contained concentrations of TPH-D, benzene, ethylbenzene, <br /> toluene and xylenes (BETX)that were below the method detection limits However, the two <br /> soil samples from the excavated material stockpile contained minor to moderate <br />• concentrations of TPH-D (220 and 35 mg/kg) <br />