My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2020
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
6100
>
4800 – General/Other Program
>
PR0535193
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:46:01 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 8:09:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4800 – General/Other Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2020
RECORD_ID
PR0535193
PE
1862
FACILITY_ID
FA0009271
FACILITY_NAME
OAK RIDGE WINERY, LLC
STREET_NUMBER
6100
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04912034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6100 E HWY 12
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Process Hazard Analysis Report July 2020 <br /> Table A: What-if Team Members <br /> Name Title Company Expertise and Years Date <br /> 7/9/20 7/10/20 <br /> Michelle 16+ years, EHS; 18+ <br /> Schlefstein Team leader APCCO years PSM / RMP; ER ✓ J <br /> trainer <br /> Trent Maintenance 3 years maintenance, <br /> Hutchison Supervisor ORW 3 years production ✓ J <br /> Wiley Service <br /> Wehba Technician APCCO 20 years in industry ./ <br /> Lynn HR Manager/ ORW 11 years in industry J ✓ <br /> Meyers Risk Mgt. Admin <br /> Richard Cellar Master ORW 8 years in industry J ✓ <br /> Ennquez <br /> Freddy Bottling ORW 6 years in industry J ✓ <br /> Gomez Supervisor <br /> 5 Scope of Process Hazard Analysis and Revalidation <br /> 5.1 Scope of Work <br /> The scope of the study was limited to the specific three (3) anhydrous ammonia <br /> processes, and included: <br /> 1. Review of relevant P&IDs <br /> 2. Preparation for the what-if sessions <br /> 3. Provide an overview of the what-if method to the team members to ensure <br /> project consistency <br /> 4. Facilitate and document the what-if study with team members <br /> 5. Develop a list of action items for changes and improvements to the <br /> process, including potential operability improvements <br /> 6. Review of previous incidents <br /> 7. Provide a detailed report and summary of the study, including study <br /> discussions and documentation, to team members for review and <br /> comment <br /> 8. Incorporate team member comments into a final report <br /> The process was divided into sections to focus the analysis. Eleven (11) sections <br /> were studied, as listed below: <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.