My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2020
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VERNALIS
>
9000
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0541637
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2020 10:19:34 AM
Creation date
9/1/2020 3:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2020
RECORD_ID
PR0541637
PE
2226
FACILITY_ID
FA0009758
FACILITY_NAME
SFPUC Tesla Treatment Facility
STREET_NUMBER
9000
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VERNALIS
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Tracy
Zip
95377
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9000 W Vernalis Rd
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Brendan Kenny <br /> October 7, 2020 <br /> Page 6 <br /> ambient environmental conditions at a waste management unit, could <br /> be released in concentrations exceeding applicable water quality <br /> objectives or that could reasonably be expected to affect beneficial uses <br /> of the waters of the state as contained in the appropriate state water <br /> quality control plan." <br /> This allegation is unfounded because: (1) the discharges cannot reasonably be <br /> expected to affect beneficial uses of the waters of the state, and (2)the <br /> discharges were not, and will not be, released to waters of the state for the <br /> reasons specified in the section above. <br /> Soil Sample Analysis Shows Results Well Below Regulatory Thresholds <br /> The NOV mentioned that the County requested that SFPUC collect soil <br /> samples from the grit pond to evaluate mercury concentrations. The McCord <br /> memorandum summarizes the soil sampling results as follows: <br /> "Soil samples collected by AEW Engineering (2018) reported mercury <br /> at concentrations ranging from below the detection (< 0.017 mg/kg) to <br /> 0.42 mg/kg with an approximate average concentration of 0.07 mg/kg, <br /> which is well below the lowest respective threshold (4 mg/kg). If all the <br /> mercury from discharges (assuming 11,000 gallons at 2.7 ug/L total Hg <br /> based on trench water monitoring data) is sequestered in the upper one <br /> inch of soil in Grit Pond#1, it would take about 680 lamp breaks for <br /> the soil to reach the lowest threshold. [..]Thus, use of Grit Pond <br /> #1 is considered a best management practice, providing on-site <br /> treatment with no off-site discharge needed and no measurable <br /> accumulation in surficial sediments to be expected." <br /> McCord's technical memorandum, which elaborates on the conclusions <br /> mentioned herein, is attached for your review. <br /> Release Water Stored in Baker Tanks Is Not Hazardous Waste <br /> In May 2019, SFPUC retained Baseline Environmental Consulting to evaluate <br /> whether the water from the Baker tanks needed to be disposed of in a <br /> hazardous waste facility. Bruce Abelli-Amen is the Managing Principal of <br /> Baseline Environmental Consulting, and has extensive experience analyzing <br /> and resolving complex water quality and hydrogeology challenges. <br /> Abelli-Amen reviewed the characterization of the water in the Baker tanks by <br /> McCampbell Analytical Inc. (lab report attached), as well as the state and <br /> federal hazardous waste regulations that apply to the mercury-contaminated <br /> water. Below is an excerpt from his memo to the SFPUC dated June 10, 2020. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.