Laserfiche WebLink
Permit application page 3 of 8 is missing applicant's signatures, workers compensation number, <br /> contractor's phone number, and fire district information. Page 3 of 8 of the permit application <br /> lists monitoring panel as 790091-001,TLS-350 was identified on your drawings. Defender series <br /> overfill valve cut sheet was provided, but OPW flapper valve is listed on your permit application <br /> (page 7 of 8), correct as appropriate and resubmit. <br /> 2) The submitted ELD work plan is not acceptable for the proposed tanks, please provide a <br /> revised ELD work plan. Please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board letter dated <br /> September 14, 2018 for additional information on ELD testing requirements (attached). <br /> 3) Provide all tank and sump cut sheets, for example Xerxes installation instructions were <br /> provided in your recent submittal in lieu of cut sheets. <br /> 4) OPW flapper valve calculation sheet was provided, it appears that maybe a Defender <br /> Series flapper valve is being proposed, please clarify, submit the appropriate calculation <br /> worksheet <br /> 5) Confirm that the proposed Phil-Tite sump covers (STP and fill sumps) are VPH <br /> compliant. <br /> 6) Please point out your safety factors on the provided buoyancy calculations; one safety <br /> factor for each tank. Also page 2 of 10 of this calculation indicates that "the dead man slab shall <br /> be 36' long x3' deep x12' wide to achieve adequate weight to resist buoyancy force", please <br /> clarify if a slab of this thickness is being proposed, none was noted on the submitted plans. <br /> 7) Drawing G.0.1 (as well as several other proposed drawings) show that canopy footing <br /> will be touching or will be extremely close to the proposed fuel piping,please revise and <br /> resubmit to reflect appropriate set back distances <br /> 8) STP sump details (G4.0 and G4.1) do not show any proposed smart sensors or vacuum <br /> communication ports or vacuum hoses. All proposed vacuum supply and communication <br /> components to be installed must be identified on proposed drawings. <br /> 9) Per your response#17 all piping cross overs will be a minimum of 12 inches,please <br /> confirm that such cross over distance will be maintained through the entire piping layout. <br /> 10) Drawing G7.1, Fe Petro leak detector is listed under VMI schedule and Phil-Tite <br /> components are listed under OPW schedule, please correct as appropriate. <br /> 11) Drawing G12.1, all vacuum zone terminations must be shown for all piping inside under <br /> dispenser containments (UDCs), identify all provisions for communication testing at each <br /> vacuum zone termination(UDCs, sumps, vent sumps, chase piping, etc.), provide a legend for <br /> any symbols (like valves) being utilized. On this drawing several vacuum hoses terminate <br /> without any apparent valves or penetrations they should be going through. Drawing G5.0 doesn't <br /> depict vacuum communication provisions for UDCs or piping. Also, it is EHD's understanding <br /> that Phill-Tite spill containers are proposed, however OPW spill containers are included on this <br /> drawing (OPW spill containers are also shown on G4.1 and several other drawings), please <br /> clarify and correct as appropriate. <br /> 12) Vacuum zone volumes were requested previously,please clarify where they were <br /> included in this revised submittal. G6.2 lists 3 vacuum zones, however, 9 smart sensors are <br /> shown on G 12 .1 , please clarify. <br /> 13) Provide the following certifications: INCON for Byron Molina, a current Xerxes <br /> certification for all tank installers (the submitted certification has a typed in expiration date), <br /> certifications for all proposed flex connectors (Unisource, Fireflex and Flexing), Phil Tite, <br /> Franklin Fueling Defender Series, and Fe Petro for leak detectors. <br />