Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT STAFF REPORT <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY COMPLAINT <br /> FOR <br /> RODNEY AND GAYLA SCHATZ <br /> MOKELUMNE RIM VINEYARDS <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Introduction <br /> Rodney and Gayla Schatz doing business as Mokelumne Rim Vineyards (hereafter referred to as <br /> "Discharger") own and operate a winery and associated wastewater treatment, storage, and disposal <br /> system, at 6200 E. Peltier Road, Acampo in San Joaquin County. The Discharger's wastewater system <br /> is regulated by Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Order No. R5-2004-0035, which prescribes <br /> requirements for the treatment, storage and LAND application of up to 5,000 gallons per day with an <br /> annual maximum of 1,650,000 gallons of wastewater to the land application area. <br /> Administrative Civil Liability Complaint (ACLC)No. R5-2005-0528 was issued because the Discharger <br /> failed to submit technical reports and complete self-monitoring reports required by the WDRs. <br /> Historical Overview <br /> Mokelumne Rim Vineyards was already constructed and operating when the WDRs were adopted. The <br /> winery is being constructed in phases with approximately 3,000 tons of grapes (approximately 450,000 <br /> gallons or 190,000 cases of wine) planned to be crushed at build out. <br /> Wastewater is collected in floor drains, screened, stored in a wastewater pond, and subsequently applied <br /> to a 35-acre land application area. The 31 July 2001 Report of Waste Discharge (RWD) stated the <br /> wastewater storage pond would provide 347,000 gallons of storage, be lined with a low permeability soil <br /> liner, and be equipped with an aerator. However, the wastewater pond was not constructed as described <br /> in the RWD. <br /> The Findings of the WDRs describe a number of deficiencies in the Discharger's wastewater system <br /> when compared to the system proposed in the RWD and therefore the WDRs required the Discharger to <br /> submit reports describing system improvements. These reports included a Water Balance and <br /> Treatment Report and a Land Application Area Improvement Report. <br /> The WDRs Findings also include requirements to install groundwater monitoring wells, improve <br /> wastewater treatment performance, and reduce the dissolved solids loading rate in the land application <br /> area. To accomplish those goals, technical reports were required in the WDRs. The reports include a <br /> Groundwater Well Installation Workplan and Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Workplan, <br /> Operation and Management Plan, Groundwater Well Installation Report of Results, Salinity Reduction <br /> Study, and Background Groundwater Quality Study Report. <br /> Staff has spent a large amount of time attempting to work with the Discharger, including meeting with <br /> the Discharger prior to the March 2004 Board meeting to make sure he understood the tentative WDRs <br /> and what would be required of him. It is noted that the Discharger did not contest the WDRs. <br /> Violations of the WDRs <br /> This section describes the Discharger's lack of compliance in each of three areas: compliance with <br /> WDRs, submittal of technical reports required by WDRs Provisions, and submittal of self-monitoring <br /> reports required by the Monitoring and Reporting Program. Each area is discussed below. <br />