My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
1214
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009004
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2020 5:34:49 PM
Creation date
9/17/2020 4:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0009004
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0004061
FACILITY_NAME
MCCORMICK & BAXTER CREOSOTING
STREET_NUMBER
1214
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95201
APN
14520001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1214 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Guidelines for an alternative method as equivalent to <br /> EPA 8040 - Phemis by OC <br /> 1 . The laboratory must document that the detection limit using the <br /> alternative methods is equivalent to or better than the <br /> instrumentation specified in SW-846, Method 8040. The laboratory <br /> can demonstrate that the alternative method is equivalent by running <br /> all compounds listed in Method 8040 an both instruments in both soil <br /> and water matrices. <br /> 2. The laboratory must state any observed interferences or any <br /> interferences anticipated based on using the proposed procedure. <br /> 3. List operating parameters of instruments as well as Chromatography <br /> columns. <br /> 4. Describe, in detail, the step-by-step procedure for preparing <br /> instrument calibration standards to include proper storage and shelf <br /> life. Indicate concentrations of calibration standards. <br /> 5. Describe, in detail, the step-by-step procedure for preparing spiked <br /> samples. <br /> 6. Laboratory must document the accuracy and precision of the <br /> alternative method are equivalent to instrumentation specified in <br /> SW-846, Method 8040. The laboratory must run three levels, one each <br /> at a low, mid-range, and high concentration, in duplicate for four <br /> days, for three different compounds chosen to give early, medium, <br /> and late retention times, in two different matrices, i.e., water and <br /> soil. The laboratory must submit all raw data including standard <br /> calibration for both instruments. <br /> 7. The laboratory must tabulate the data and determine the relative <br /> percent difference between the daily duplicates for each matrix, <br /> compound, and each target concentration for both the alternative <br /> method and the equivalent instrumentation specified in SW-846, <br /> Method 8040 using the format on Table is and ib. Next, the <br /> laboratory must tabulate the average found concentration and % <br /> recovery for each concentration, for each matrix and for each <br /> instrument using the format on Table 2. Finally, the laboratory <br /> must tabulate the overall precision - the average found value, <br /> standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) for each <br /> compound, at each concentration, for each matrix, and for each <br /> instrument using the format on Table 3. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.