Laserfiche WebLink
James T. Allen , Ph.D <br /> Page 5 <br /> July 31 , 1987 <br /> The workplan has been revised to take into account the <br /> changes in monitoring frequency, and to more clearly address <br /> the intent and rationale for the monitoring program. <br /> McCormick and Baxter believes that the monitoring plan de- <br /> scribed in the revised workplan will provide sufficient in- <br /> formation to meet the stated goals of defining limits of <br /> contamination and protecting public health. <br /> Comments 20 and 21 : McCormick & Baxter and the State agree <br /> on the purpose and needs of aquifer testing. However, DHS <br /> and RWQCB comments regarding the technical methods of <br /> implementing aquifer tests remain the major unresolved issue <br /> between McCormick & Baxter and the agencies . Additionally, <br /> there appears to be disagreement between DHS and RWQCB re- <br /> garding some technical aspects of aquifer test methods . As <br /> was agreed during the June 23 meeting, aquifer testing will <br /> not proceed until these issues have been resolved. A meeting <br /> should be held between DHS and RWQCB groundwater specialists , <br /> and CH2M HILL groundwater specialists to resolve these issues. <br /> McCormick & Baxter suggests that this meeting occur after <br /> the next round of wells is installed, and will await notifica- <br /> tion of this meeting. <br /> Comments 34 , 37 , 39 , and 40 : These comments apply to various <br /> activities under the SRWCF Treatability Assessment. McCormick <br /> & Baxter agrees that some or all of these activities may be <br /> required but it is necessary to first initiate data collection <br /> and the feasibility study. Then, if these items are required, <br /> they will be implemented in order to provide the appropriate <br /> information. <br /> Comment 53 : The part of Comment 53 that applies to sample <br /> containers has been addressed in the revised workplan. How- <br /> ever, McCormick & Baxter believes that sample integrity will <br /> be maintained if soil samples are split in the laboratory <br /> under controlled conditions . The potential for cross contami- <br /> nation and false positives results is much higher by handling <br /> samples in the field than in the laboratory. Because soils <br /> samples need not be separated in order to preserve splits in <br /> different manners , it is most appropriate to ship single <br /> samples and carefully split the samples in the lab. <br /> In accordance with your letter of July 3 , 1987 , McCormick & <br /> Baxter has initiated workplan activities as of July 20 , 1987 . <br /> There will be a lot of work performed in the coming months <br />