My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
1214
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009004
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2020 5:34:49 PM
Creation date
9/17/2020 4:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0009004
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0004061
FACILITY_NAME
MCCORMICK & BAXTER CREOSOTING
STREET_NUMBER
1214
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95201
APN
14520001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1214 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jim Tjosvold <br /> Page 9 <br /> July 3 , 1987 <br /> Samples for analysis by EPA method 602 should be <br /> preserved by adjusting to a pH less than 2 with <br /> 50% hydrochloric acid. <br /> Information for preserving chlorinated phenols with KOH <br /> must be provided. <br /> The pH for preserving metal samples and hold times has <br /> not been provided. <br /> It is incorrect to preserve nitrosoamines with nitric <br /> acid. Proper preservatives, containers, and hold times <br /> must be stated. <br /> 53 . We question the size for soil sample containers. Minimum <br /> container volumes (weights) for all analyses must be <br /> defined. Samples for the various analyses should be <br /> divided into separate containers in the field to <br /> eliminate any cross contamination in the laboratory. <br /> 54 . The State does riot accept the statement that soil <br /> detection limits cannot be stated because of <br /> interferences. The best achievable limits must be listed <br /> for each compound of interest. Deviations from these <br /> levels based on matrix effects must be explained at the <br /> time of issuing the report. <br /> 55 . To reduce any possibility of confusion over the use of <br /> TSP for cleaning sampling equipment, all soil sampling <br /> equipment should also use a non-phosphate detergent. <br /> 56 . Soil samples at the ground s-irface should be of the first <br /> six inches of depth. The subsequent samples down through <br /> the soil profile should continue from the six inch depth. <br /> 57 . The State requests to be notified prior to sample <br /> disposal . <br /> 58 . There is no statement in this workplan for providing <br /> analysis through a referee laboratory. It was requested <br /> by our last comments (3-18-87) to reactivate the <br /> laboratory fund. We understand that there is <br /> approximately $8, 300 left in this fund and the State can <br /> arrange for the fund's use and split selection through <br /> Randy Peterson of CH2M Hill . <br /> 59. Regarding laboratory quality assurance, method blanks, <br /> duplicates, and spikes must be analyzed a minimum of once <br /> for every batch of samples or type of matrix or 20 <br /> samples, whichever is more frequent. <br /> 60. The work schedule provides for expedient results on many <br /> tasks. The Department finds this schedule to be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.