My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
1214
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009004
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2020 5:34:49 PM
Creation date
9/17/2020 4:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0009004
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0004061
FACILITY_NAME
MCCORMICK & BAXTER CREOSOTING
STREET_NUMBER
1214
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95201
APN
14520001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1214 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES <br /> TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL PROGRAM <br /> TOXICOLOGY AND RISK ASSESSMENT UNIT <br /> SCIENTIFIC GUIDANCE MEMO 89-2 <br /> August 4 , 1989 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> Use of Non-Detect and Limit of Detection Values <br /> in Exposure Assessments <br /> Guidance In The Use Of Non-Detect And Limit Of Detection Values <br /> 1 . Professional judgement should be exercised to distinguish <br /> those chemicals reported as ND which are actually likely to be <br /> oresent at levels below the limit of detection, from those <br /> chemicals for which there is a high probability that the ND value <br /> truly represents a concentration of zero. <br /> 2 . Within either the characterization report or the risk <br /> assessment report, the analytical data on the concentration of <br /> chemicals in various media should be statistically analyzed to <br /> determine whether the frequencies of concentrations fit either a <br /> lognormal or a normal distribution. If these data are not <br /> available, consider requesting that the report be revised to <br /> include such an analysis. The default alternative is to assume <br /> that the data are lognormally distributed. <br /> 3 . As pointed out by Hornung & Reed (1987) and EPA (1988) , when <br /> chemical concentrations in a medium are lognormally distributed, <br /> as is generally the case fcr sclvent plumes, the best estimate, <br /> for statistical reasons, of a reported ND value is the limit of_ <br /> detection (LOD) divided by the square root of 2 (1. 414) . When <br /> determining the mean of several values, some greater than LOD and <br /> some ND, this method should be used to assign a non-zero value to <br /> ND values , unless the data justify an alternate treatment. <br /> 4 . The geometric mean, rather than the arithmetic mean, should <br /> be used to estimate the average concentration of a chemical in a <br /> defined volume of a medium which contains the entire plume. The <br /> geometric mean assumes that the concentration of the chemical in <br /> the medium is lognormally distributed, including NDs. Values <br /> reported as ND should be treated as defined in point 3 above. <br /> Geometric mean = (Cl * C2 * C3 * . . . * Cn) l/n <br /> C1 = Concentration of a specific chemical in sample 1 <br /> C2 = Concentration of a specific chemical in sample 2 <br /> C3 = Concentration of a specific chemical in sample 3 <br /> n = number of samples <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.