My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
1214
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009004
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2020 5:34:49 PM
Creation date
9/17/2020 4:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0009004
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0004061
FACILITY_NAME
MCCORMICK & BAXTER CREOSOTING
STREET_NUMBER
1214
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95201
APN
14520001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1214 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Mr. Jeff Van Slooten <br /> Page 4 <br /> distance at which an observation well must be located to obtain a <br /> specific drawdown in an equivalent isotropic system. A Kr/KZ <br /> value of 2 .84 is presented on page B-5. This value was <br /> calculated for r=15 feet, or the location of observation well <br /> DSW-4B. Unless and until other values of Kr/KZ are calculated at <br /> other observation wells, the hydraulic conductivity ratio applies <br /> only to the area in the vicinity of DSW-4B. Without similar <br /> calculations for other locations, it is misleading to imply that <br /> the aquifer is equally as anisotropic in other directions or at <br /> other locations. This distinction should be discussed beneath <br /> Equation B. 6 on page B-5. <br /> In summary, it is encouraging to see that a variety of aquifer <br /> test analysis methods were used to examine the data. However, a <br /> more thorough overall explanation describing why each method was <br /> chosen and why it is believed that one method is more appropriate <br /> than the others should be included in the text and appendices. <br /> J <br /> Diane Nork, Engineering Geologist <br /> Technical Services Unit <br /> Toxic Substances Control Division <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.