My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
1214
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009004
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2020 5:34:49 PM
Creation date
9/17/2020 4:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0009004
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0004061
FACILITY_NAME
MCCORMICK & BAXTER CREOSOTING
STREET_NUMBER
1214
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95201
APN
14520001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1214 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J Mailing address: <br /> / _, •� 300 Montgomery Street <br /> V'a S 6r San Francisco,California 94104 <br /> (415)982-?033 <br /> Telex No.34-0488 <br /> L �. � ' 1k WCOD DESERVES <br /> CREOSOTING CO. ?RESERVING <br /> August 18 , 1988 <br /> James T. Allen, Ph.D. <br /> Chief, Northern California Section �JJ <br /> Department of Health Services <br /> 4250 Power Inn Road <br /> Sacramento, California 95825 E�V�kpr�,F!�TAL HEALTH <br /> FERIAIT/SER��ICES <br /> Dear Dr. Allen: <br /> We have reviewed your letter of July 27 , 1988 and the <br /> attached comments. Overall, we are most appreciative of the <br /> State' s general approval of our plan and the effort being <br /> made to efficiently solve the problems at the site. <br /> The State ' s proposal that we immediately submit an air <br /> monitoring plan and a dioxin testing plan will require some <br /> discussion. <br /> We are currently conducting an Air Monitoring Program <br /> at our Portland, Oregon plant under the direction of the <br /> D.E.Q. As both plants are virtually identical, it would <br /> seem logical to obtain the Portland results before duplicat- <br /> ing the work in California. Someone from DHS or CVRWQCB <br /> could visit the Portland site, review the work plan, and <br /> monitor the results as required to verify the suitability of <br /> this proposal. <br /> Our Preliminary Site Assessment for Dioxins, October, <br /> 1987 concluded that dioxins should not be a significant pub- <br /> lic health concern at Stockton. We are unaware of any new <br /> site specific data or general scientific data that would <br /> heighten our concern. To the contrary, EPA appears to be <br /> reassessing dioxin, indicating that it is less toxic than <br /> previously theorized. We would like to commence sampling in <br /> eight (8) months as proposed. <br /> 1 <br /> Finally, it is my understanding that our CRP is up and <br /> running. Apparently there was a good meeting last week be- <br /> tween your staff and CH2M HILL and the program should run <br /> smoothly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.