My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2526
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0514248
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2020 5:20:11 PM
Creation date
9/22/2020 4:37:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0514248
PE
2294
FACILITY_ID
FA0010245
FACILITY_NAME
DTE STOCKTON LLC
STREET_NUMBER
2526
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2526 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of non-carbon dioxide greenhouse gases. There are no thresholds yet adopted for greenhouse gas <br /> emissions at either project or cumulative levels. <br /> The Project has incorporated in its design and the air emission mitigation measures its operations <br /> procedures, maximum feasible mitigation for greenhouse gas emissions and restrictions on types of <br /> permitted waste streams,24-hour encapsulation of biosolids and chipped construction lumber, landfill gas <br /> collection system, landfill gas flare, purchase of 788 trees and onsite equipment engine controls. It is <br /> assumed that the County will similarly implement and/or incorporate in the Project-area composting and <br /> landfill operations maximum feasible mitigation for greenhouse gas emissions. Nevertheless, it is <br /> concluded that, in the absence of thresholds, and because of the adverse environmental effects of global <br /> warming, cumulative greenhouse gas emissions are a significant environmental effect. <br /> Fmdina <br /> The cumulative air quality impact from greenhouse gas emissions is considered significant and <br /> unavoidable. All feasible and reasonable changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated <br /> into,the project that substantially lessen the potentially significant effect as identified in the Final EIR. <br /> Brief Explanation of the Rationale for the Finding <br /> CEQA requires that all feasible and reasonable mitigation be applied to the project to reduce the impacts <br /> from greenhouse gas emissions on air quality and global climate change. Implementation of Mitigation <br /> Measures 4.1-2, 4.1-3, 4.1-4, and 4.1-5, 4-1.7 and project level design constraints would reduce <br /> greenhouse gas emissions. No other reasonable or feasible mitigation has been identified that will reduce <br /> impacts to-air quality for the project. The cumulative air quality impact is considered significant and <br /> unavoidable. <br /> Biological Resources <br /> A. Environmental Effects Of The Project Found To Have No Impact On The <br /> Environment,or Have A Less Than Significant Impact On The Environment. <br /> The project will not disturb Oak tree woodlands. <br /> The project will not conflict with other Habitat Conservation Plans(HCPs)or Habitat Lands. <br /> B. Environmental Effects Of The Project That Are Potentially Significant, But That <br /> Can Be Mitigated To A Less Than Significant Level. <br /> Potential Significant Effect <br /> Without proper mitigation,the project has the potential to disturb rare or endangered plant or animal life. <br /> Description of Specific Impact <br /> Construction and operations related activities associated with the proposed Project have the potential to <br /> result in impacts to rare or endangered plant or animal life. Potential impacts to species identified in . <br /> Table 4.2-3, could result from vehicle strikes, crushing or entombment, excavation or soil stockpiling <br /> activities, removal of vegetation or habitat features such as niches on the pit walls that could contain nest <br /> ............................ - <br /> Findings of Fact—Section 15091 March 15,2016 <br /> H.M. Holloway.Landfill Modification Project Final Board of Supervisors <br /> 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.