My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1996-2026
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
12001
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0507825
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1996-2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2026 3:13:56 PM
Creation date
9/23/2020 2:07:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1996-2026
RECORD_ID
PR0507825
PE
4442 - SW COMPOST SITE - QUARTERLY INSPECTION
FACILITY_ID
FA0003867
FACILITY_NAME
DELICATO VINEYARDS LLC
STREET_NUMBER
12001
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20405008
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\kblackwell
Supplemental fields
Site Address
12001 S STATE ROUTE 99 MANTECA 95336
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER R5-2013-0028 -21- <br /> DELICATO VINEYARDS, INC. <br /> DELICATO FAMILY VINEYARDS <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> implemented to date. If the required improvements do not result in <br /> significantly improved groundwater quality within five years of adoption of this <br /> Order, the Provisions require that the Discharger implement additional <br /> treatment or control as necessary to bring the discharge into compliance with <br /> the Basin Plan water quality objective. This Order also requires that the <br /> Discharger evaluate existing and potential future local agricultural uses of <br /> groundwater to support determination of a site-specific water quality objective <br /> that is protective of all beneficial uses. <br /> b. Nitrate. For nutrients such as nitrate, the potential for degradation depends <br /> on effluent quality; crop uptake, and the ability of the vadose zone below the <br /> LAAs to be conducive to nitrification and denitrification to convert the effluent <br /> nitrogen to nitrate and the nitrate to nitrogen gas before it reaches the water <br /> table. Most of the nitrogen in the process wastewater is present as TKN, <br /> which can readily mineralize and convert to nitrate (with some loss via <br /> ammonia volatilization) in the LAAs. Background groundwater quality is poor <br /> with respect to nitrogen and exceeds the primary MCL of 10 mg/L in <br /> background monitoring wells MW4, MW-5, and MW-1, which are upgradient <br /> of the current discharge locations. The poor quality background groundwater <br /> is likely due to the predominantly agricultural land use in the area. In <br /> contrast, nitrate concentrations in groundwater downgradient of the current <br /> unlined ponds and LAAs are below the primary MCL in MW-2 and MW-3. <br /> The expanded LAA system will maximize nitrogen uptake by crops and <br /> minimize the potential for nitrate to migrate to groundwater. Therefore, this <br /> Order requires that nutrients associated with the wastewater and other <br /> sources be applied to the LAAs at rates consistent with crop demand, and the <br /> Groundwater Limitations require that the discharge not cause any statistically <br /> significant increase in groundwater nitrate concentrations. <br /> c. Sulfate. The average sulfate concentration in the process wastewater <br /> averages 154 mg/L. Background groundwater sulfate concentrations are <br /> spatially variable with intrawell means that range from 8 mg/L to 97 mg/L. <br /> Sulfate concentrations in downgradient monitoring well MW-3 show clear <br /> evidence of degradation due to the concentrations exceeding the Secondary <br /> MCL of 250 mg/L since December 2009. Following completion of the <br /> improvements required by this Order, sulfate concentrations in the <br /> downgradient monitoring wells are expected to improve but it is not possible <br /> to predict the level of improvement that can achieved or when it might occur. <br /> Therefore, this Order sets a groundwater limitation for sulfate at the <br /> Secondary MCL. The intent of this limit is not to allow additional degradation <br /> beyond that which has already occurred, but as a safeguard to accommodate <br /> short-term increases due to the inherent uncertainty associated with future <br /> transport of waste constituents already present in the vadose zone beneath <br /> the existing LAAs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.