My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1991-2001
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
0
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0515734
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1991-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2025 11:32:48 AM
Creation date
9/25/2020 3:47:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1991-2001
RECORD_ID
PR0515734
PE
4430 - SOLID WASTE CIA SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0012312
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF TRACY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303015
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
SITE_LOCATION
CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Pending
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
CORRAL HOLLOW RD TRACY 95376
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Wendy Arano Project No.: 791291 <br /> June 7, 2001 <br /> Page 5 <br /> • Because the Corcoran Clay horizon does not exist hydraulically upgradient of <br /> the landfill, all of the shallow monitoring wells are along the downgradient <br /> point of compliance of the landfill. However, because the EMP has not shown <br /> the presence of any contamination at shallow well MW-4, and Title 27 <br /> Section 20415(b)(2) allows for alternate background locations. We, therefore, <br /> propose that the shallow monitoring well MW-4 be recognized as the <br /> background well for the landfill. <br /> • The initiation of groundwater monitoring in a secondary series of deeper wells <br /> is not necessary with the depressed state of the deep groundwater zone. This is <br /> because of the following: <br /> • VOC contamination was not detected when the water level in the deep zone <br /> was higher. <br /> • The greatest threat to deep zone contamination was present when the landfill <br /> was operational and the existing deep zone wells were operational. <br /> • The existing secondary series of deep wells are currently monitored for the <br /> presence of groundwater. If the deep groundwater zone ever rebounds to <br /> where the existing secondary series of deep wells are saturated, water quality <br /> monitoring will be initiated at that time. <br /> • The mechanism for the landfill to be a stable source of VOC contamination to <br /> both the deep and shallow zones has been greatly diminished with the <br /> commencement of operation of the LFG extraction system. <br /> • The cost of the installation of a new secondary series of deeper wells is not a <br /> good use of public funds for the following reasons: <br /> • Because of ongoing overdraft that is occurring in the deep regional <br /> groundwater it is not possible to predict how deep into the zone of saturation <br /> the new wells will need to be installed before they also go dry. <br /> • Public funds are better allocated in shallow zone groundwater and vadose zone <br /> gas monitoring if the overall purpose of monitoring program is to provide the <br /> best assurance of the earliest possible detection of a release, and the shallow <br /> zone will be used to monitor progress of remediation. <br /> \\SACRFPI\COMMON\sacDP\2001\PRJ\PJ7\791291.1 aa.doc <br /> (00006000) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.