My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1991-2001
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
0
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0515734
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1991-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2025 11:32:48 AM
Creation date
9/25/2020 3:47:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1991-2001
RECORD_ID
PR0515734
PE
4430 - SOLID WASTE CIA SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0012312
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF TRACY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303015
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
SITE_LOCATION
CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Pending
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
CORRAL HOLLOW RD TRACY 95376
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE IREMENTS ORDER NO. -10- <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> FOR POST-CLOSURE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION MONITORING <br /> CORRAL HOLLOW SANITARY LANDFILL <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> selected from among those methods which would provide valid results in light of any <br /> matrix effects or interferences. <br /> 11. "Trace" results -results falling between the MDL and the practical quantitation limit <br /> (PQL) - shall be reported as such, and shall be accompanied both by the estimated <br /> MDL and PQL values for that analytical run. <br /> 12. MDLs and PQLs shall be derived by the laboratory for each analytical procedure, <br /> according to State of California laboratory accreditation procedures. These MDLs <br /> and PQLs shall reflect the detection and quantitation capabilities of the specific <br /> analytical procedure and equipment used by the lab, rather than simply being quoted <br /> from USEPA analytical method manuals. In relatively interference-free water, <br /> laboratory-derived MDLs and PQLs are expected to closely agree with published <br /> USEPA MDLs and PQLs. <br /> 13. If the laboratory suspects that, due to a change in matrix or other effects,the true <br /> detection limit or quantitation limit for a particular analytical run differs significantly <br /> from the laboratory-derived MDL/PQL values,the results shall be flagged <br /> accordingly, along with estimates of the detection limit and quantitation limit actually <br /> achieved. The MDL shall always be calculated such that it represents the lowest <br /> achievable concentration associated with a 99% reliability of a nonzero result. <br /> The PQL shall always be calculated such that it represents the lowest constituent <br /> concentration at which a numerical value can be assigned with reasonable certainty <br /> that it represents the constituent's actual concentration in the sample. Normally, <br /> PQLs should be set equal to the concentration of the lowest standard used to calibrate <br /> the analytical procedure. <br /> 14. All QA/QC data shall be reported, along with the sample results to which they apply, <br /> including the method, equipment, analytical detection and quantitation limits,the <br /> percent recovery, an explanation for any recovery that falls outside the QC limits,the <br /> results of equipment and method blanks,the results of spiked and surrogate samples, <br /> the frequency of quality control analysis, and the name and qualifications of the <br /> person(s)performing the analyses. Sample results shall be reported unadjusted for <br /> blank results or spike recoveries. In cases where contaminants are detected in <br /> QA/QC samples (i.e., field, trip, or lab blanks),the accompanying sample results shall <br /> be appropriately flagged. <br /> 15. Unknown chromatographic peaks shall be reported, along with an estimate of the <br /> concentration of the unknown analyte. When unknown peaks are encountered, second <br /> column or second method confirmation procedures shall be performed to attempt to <br /> identify and more accurately quantify the unknown analyte. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.