Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB , January 2002 Page of <br /> 9. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES <br /> Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes 0 <br /> Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ <br /> Test Method Developed By : ❑ Spill Bucket Manufacturer Rl Industry Standard F, Professional Engineer <br /> ❑ Other (Specify) <br /> Test Method Used : ❑ Pressure U Vacuum Fv Hydrostatic <br /> ❑ Other (Specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used : Equipment Resolution : <br /> Spill Box # 87 van Spill Box # 91n Spill Box # 91s In Spill Box # <br /> Bucket Diameter: 12.00" 12 .00" 12.00" <br /> Bucket Depth : 13. 00" 13 .00" 13 .00" <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes <br /> starting test : <br /> Test Start Time : 10:30am 10: 30am 10: 30am <br /> Initial Reading ( Rj ) : 12 .00" 12,00" 12 .00" <br /> Test End Time : 11 :30am 11 : 30am 11 : 30am <br /> Final Reading (RF) : 12 .00" 0. 00" 12 .00" <br /> Test Duration : 60 minutes 60 minutes 60 minutes <br /> Change in Reading (RF-Rj) : 0. 00" 12.00" 0.00" <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or 0.062" 0.062" 0 .062" <br /> Criteria : <br /> Test Result : O Pass C Fail ❑ Pass 11Fail Pass ❑ Fail 0 Pass ❑ Fail <br /> Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommended folloly-rrp for failed tests) <br /> 91 north vapor bucket failed due to cracked bottom . bucket is OPW direct bury with plastic bottom , checked riser, and adapter also made sure that <br /> i <br /> i <br /> E <br />