Laserfiche WebLink
Giuseppe Sanfilippo <br /> San Joaquin County Planning Commission <br /> Re. Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for Use Permit No. PA-1800316 of Ahmed <br /> Hussein (c/o Shack& Company) <br /> February 21,2020 <br /> Page 5 <br /> outside of spring and summer months, also leaves unanswered the question of how manure <br /> will be disposed, and water quality impacts avoided, in the fall and winter months. Manure <br /> application immediately preceding a significant rain event is a high pollution risk and should <br /> be avoided. <br /> Finally, Mr. Chesney states: <br /> It is imperative that equal distribution of manure prior to cropland planting be <br /> observed. Animal pens that are installed in the cropland must also be rotated <br /> when manure accumulates and the crop has mostly been completed. <br /> (Id.) These essential operating conditions are plainly mitigation measures and must be <br /> included in the IS/MND and MMRP. <br /> It is possible that permits required by other regulatory agencies would ensure that <br /> groundwater and surface water quality are protected, and substantial degradation and <br /> significant impacts from manure spreading are avoided. However, the IS/MND fails to <br /> clearly address the permitting requirements, or include enforceable mitigation measures with <br /> performance standards that would ensure that significant impacts are avoided. <br /> In its January 17, 2019 comment letter(Staff Report, Attachment B, pp. 25-29), the <br /> RWQCB identifies a number of applicable regulatory requirements, including waste discharge <br /> requirements and compliance with the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program; a mitigation <br /> measure should be included to require compliance with this program and all permits identified <br /> by the RWQCB. The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department Confined <br /> Animal Facility Manure/Solid Waste Management Plan Guidance Document is included with <br /> the Manure Management Plan documentation (Staff Report,Attachment D,p.44); however, <br /> the IS/MND does not explain whether the Project complies with these guidelines. Further,the <br /> proposed Conditions of Approval state"Owner shall check with the SWRCB to determine if <br /> an Industrial Storm Water Permit will be required." (Staff Report, Attachment F,P. 6, <br /> Condition 2.h.) This condition does not ensure that the owner will obtain any permit or <br /> comply with the conditions to a storm water permit. <br /> The County, as the CEQA lead agency, has the obligation to ensure that impacts are <br /> clearly avoided and to adopt adequate enforceable mitigation measures. The IS/MND must <br /> be revised to include a mitigation measure requiring that the owner consult with the SWRCB <br /> and, if necessary, obtain an Industrial Storm Water Permit, and comply with all conditions of <br /> any such permit. Finally,the IS/MND also should include mitigation measures ensuring <br /> compliance with the operating conditions outlined in Mr. Chesney's Manure Management <br /> Plan analysis, as discussed above. <br />