My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0082741_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
23649
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0082741_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2020 9:22:36 AM
Creation date
11/23/2020 9:14:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0082741
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
HARNEY LANE PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
23649
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06704009
ENTERED_DATE
10/15/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
23649 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> In summary, the soil conditions on each proposed parcel of the Site were found to be <br /> suitable for standard septic systems utilizing leach lines and seepage pits. No septic <br /> construction is proposed. <br /> Satisfactory soil percolation rates of 2.4 min/in (Parcel 1), 16.7 min/in (Parcel 2), 12.5 <br /> min/in (Parcel 3), 50.0 min/in (Parcel 4), 10.0 min/in (Parcel 5), 35.7 min/in (Parcel 6), <br /> 20.8 min/in (Parcel 7), and 50.0 min/in (Parcel 8) were observed at the test locations. <br /> The variability of the test results reflects the wide range of soil types encountered <br /> across the Site, including clays, sands, silts, gravel, and cobbles. <br /> The depth of ground water based on recent aquifer levels is approximately 205 to 334 <br /> feet below ground surface. Regional ground water appears to flow to the southwest; the <br /> rate could not be calculated because the Site is beyond the mapped area. <br /> Because of the percolation rate between 1.0 and 5.0 min/in encountered on Parcel 1, <br /> the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department will require a 20-foot <br /> separation from the bottom of the dispersal system to ground water. Because of the <br /> percolation rates between 5.0 and 30.0 min/in encountered on Parcel 2, 3, 5, and 7, an <br /> eight-foot separation from the bottom of the dispersal system to ground water will be <br /> required. Based on the anticipated depth to ground water, no modifications to standard <br /> septic systems should be necessary. <br /> Neither well on the Site is currently operational; no water sample was collected as part <br /> of this investigation. Based on a review of the San Joaquin County Environmental <br /> Health Department's maps of nitrate and DBCP detections in nearby wells, neither <br /> contaminant appears to be present above the MCL in the vicinity of the Site. <br /> There are no plans to develop the Site, and there are currently no structures on the Site. <br /> Based on the method and assumptions described, rnp ntaining zero development on <br /> each parcel would result in a buildup of nitrates 'n the aquifer up to 0.3 mg/L-N, <br /> equivalent to the measured rainwater concentration. <br /> For the purpose of this study, however, Live Oak assumed a hypothetical five-bedroom <br /> primary residence and three-bedroom second unit dwelling for each parcel. These were <br /> considered so that, should the owners at some point in the future decide to build on the <br /> land, nitrate loading will have been addressed. Utilizing the methods and assumptions <br /> described, the nitrate loading calculation indicates that the use of on-site septic tanks <br /> and drain field systems on the Site has the potential to cause a buildup of nitrate in the <br /> aquifer up to 0.5 mg/L for Parcel 8, and 0.6 mg/L for Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, well <br /> below the MCL of 10 mg/L-N. Because of the favorable result of the nitrate loading <br /> study, no nitrate mitigation is recommended. <br /> LOGE 20-29 Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.