My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013792
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOCKE
>
12470
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2000007
>
SU0013792
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2021 10:51:11 AM
Creation date
11/30/2020 10:33:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013792
PE
2637
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2000007
STREET_NUMBER
12470
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOCKE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LOCKEFORD
Zip
95237-
APN
05132012
ENTERED_DATE
11/30/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
12470 E LOCKE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/30/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sshih
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Dept. <br />1810 E. Hazelton Avenue <br />Stockton CA 95205 <br />Reference Application # <br />PA- 2000007 <br />PA- 2000094 <br />To whom it may concern, <br />2020 <br />CemmJoaquin County <br />nity Development <br />We are concerned citizens regarding the proposal to bring in a Cannabis <br />Business Park on Locke Road here in Lockeford, Calif. We are deeply <br />concerned that this would gravely and adversely affect our small community <br />if allowed to be erected in the heart of our small town! <br />Traffic on and near this sight would increase in immense proportions. <br />Our current traffic through our thoroughfare (Highway 88) is already <br />overtaxed at times. The additional traffic and truck deliveries, etc. on Hi. 88 <br />and Locke Rd. would severely compound this issue and cause great stress, <br />not to mention great inconvenience, to possible catastrophic measure, on our <br />community. <br />There is the issue of the overwhelming, undesirable stench that would <br />accompany the operation of a plant of this nature. Additionally, the issue of <br />the amount of water this plant would warrant could prove very detrimental <br />due to the enormous strain it would pose on our water supply. <br />We are also concerned about the drug activity this would encourage. <br />We're aware of the laws and medicinal benefit to a smaller percentage of the <br />population, however, we believe that our community, which is comprised <br />mostly of family units (including impressionable children), would be gravely <br />effected. We believe it's time we put the health and welfare of our children <br />and families first! We must be careful what we promote and allow. When <br />we allow things that do not exemplify the healthy future of our families, we <br />cripple the understanding of what is acceptable. <br />Concerned citizens, <br />.- ,— �j�ery I S{-ccn l` u� + z <br />Lf n CC ( ldapg. 1 <br />b�v t <br />tcljard 3aepe� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.