Laserfiche WebLink
D. L. & JoAnn Von Aspern <br />POB 243 <br />Murphys, CA 95247 <br />Cell 916-591-2679 <br />dvajet@aol.com <br />VIA EMAIL — 2ND OF TWO <br />December 28, 2020 <br />Giuseppe Sanfilippo <br />San Joaquin County Community Development Dept <br />RE: PA -2000007 (PP) & PA -2000094 (DA) Site Address 12470 Locke Road. <br />I am writing to express that the determination of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the subject project is <br />deficient, based on the findings presented below. <br />CEQA statute indicates that the California "Cortese" database shall be reviewed for known or potential <br />hazardous materials release sites. The Cal -EPA website lists several agency databases that currently "provide <br />information regarding the facilities or sites identified as meeting the `Cortese list' requirements" (see screen <br />shot attached). Your Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) dated November 23, 2020 reviewed only one of <br />the five databases that are equivalent to the Cortese database. The subject property IS listed under two <br />different categories on the SWRCB GeoTracker database. This lack of statutorily -required Cortese <br />agency database review is a significant deficiency in the MND. The subject property is listed as case -closed <br />in one GeoTracker entry, but the lack of appropriate agency database review is inexcusable. And one of the two <br />GeoTracker listings does not list any information regarding the nature of historic inflows to the "Industrial <br />Wastewater Ponds" that the property historically contained. Thus, it cannot be determined whether that area of <br />the property has become contaminated based on historical discharges to land. <br />Based on the deficiencies listed above, the Applicant should be required to provide to the County and submit <br />into the Public Record its Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA). This ESA is highly likely to have been <br />prepared by a recent or previous site purchaser, and is typically mandated as part of a lender's review of <br />accepting the property as collateral, for example. Furthermore, given the presence of an apparent catalytic <br />"cracking tower" on the property, it is highly likely that at some point in its history the property was used as <br />something other than a "winery." Review of a properly performed ESA by licensed professional(s) would shed <br />light on historical land uses; and, would present an opinion regarding known or suspected instances of <br />hazardous materials contamination of soils and/or groundwater. <br />Thank you for this opportunity to comment and we look forward to the County's defensible responses. <br />David Von Aspern <br />Authorized Agent for JoAnn Von Aspern <br />Landowner @ 17832 N. Tretheway Road <br />