Laserfiche WebLink
water aquifer, it is possible that any remaining surface contaminants may be transported <br /> to the first saturated zone of the aquifer. <br /> Clay soils, like those found on this Site, also tend to inhibit downward movement of <br /> nitrate due to adsorption of the nitrate ions to the soil. <br /> Sources of Nitrate <br /> Dairies, orchards that require fertilization in sandy soils, and septic systems have been <br /> found to be the most significant sources of nitrate in ground water. <br /> Percolating Recharge Waters <br /> One of the most determinant factors in the Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is the <br /> rate of recharge from percolating waters, which mix with the downward-percolating <br /> effluent generated by on-site septic systems. In the original Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> paper, only "average recharge rate of rainfall" was considered. <br /> Based on San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department policy (personal <br /> communication, March 18, 2019), the recharge input for the Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> equation should be derived from average monthly precipitation of rainfall and <br /> evapotranspiration rates for the area; the data should be obtained from the California <br /> Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS), preferably from stations located <br /> within San Joaquin County. Recharge is calculated by first determining whether the <br /> average monthly precipitation exceeds average monthly potential evapotranspiration. If <br /> so, then the difference is the percolating recharge water into the aquifer. Runoff and <br /> stream infiltration drainage are not factored into the calculation. This approach likely <br /> under-estimates recharge to the aquifer and, consequently, over-estimates nitrate <br /> loading. <br /> The project Site is located relatively far from any CIMIS stations (10.3 and 12.2 miles to <br /> the closest stations within San Joaquin County) but closer (7.5 miles) to a station <br /> monitored by the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC). As a result, two scenarios <br /> have been run for the Site, the first using strictly CIMIS data, and the second using a <br /> combination of CIMIS and WRCC data. <br /> Recharge Scenario 1 — CIMIS Ripon & Holt Stations <br /> For the CIMIS-only scenario, the local percolation and evapotranspiration rates obtained <br /> through CIMIS are presented in Plates 12 and 13. The closest CIMIS stations to the <br /> Site are Ripon (249) and Holt (248), located approximately 10.3 and 12.2 miles away, <br /> respectively. Data for these stations were available for 2017, 2018, and 2019. Based <br /> on the calculation shown, the estimated rate of recharge from percolating waters for the <br /> Ripon station is determined to be 3.00 inches (Plate 12); the estimated rate of recharge <br /> LOGE 20-48 Page 9 <br />