My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013754
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SCHULTE
>
14800
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1900208
>
SU0013754
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2020 4:29:42 PM
Creation date
12/15/2020 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013754
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1900208
STREET_NUMBER
14800
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SCHULTE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20924023
ENTERED_DATE
11/12/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
14800 W SCHULTE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/2/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sshih
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PotentiallyLess Than Less Than <br /> Significant Significant with Significant No <br /> g Mitigation g <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the <br /> environment through the routine transport, use, or F-1 111:1disposal of hazardous materials? <br /> b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the <br /> environment through reasonably foreseeable upset —1 —1 —1and accident conditions involvingthe release of <br /> hazardous materials into the environment? <br /> c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or <br /> acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste ❑ ❑ —1 161within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed <br /> school? <br /> d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of <br /> hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to <br /> Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, ❑ 1:11:1would it create a significant hazard to the public or <br /> the environment? <br /> e) For a project located within an airport land use plan <br /> or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within <br /> two miles ofapublic airport or public airport, ❑ —1 —1 X❑ <br /> would the project result in a safety hazard or <br /> excessive noise for people residing or working in the <br /> project area? <br /> f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with <br /> an adopted emergency response plan or emergency ❑ 1:11:1evacuation plan? <br /> g) Expose people or structures, either directly or <br /> indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death <br /> involving wildland fires, including where wildlands ❑ 1:1Elare adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences <br /> are intermixed with wildlands? <br /> Impact Discussion: <br /> a) Less-than-Significant Impact. Under existing conditions, the project site is unoccupied and contains several soil <br /> stockpiles associated with the site's previous use as biomass energy facility, which has since been demolished. A <br /> Phase II subsurface investigation was conducted at the project site to investigate impacts of the potential release <br /> of hazardous materials that may have been handled on the project site as a result of previous on-site operations. <br /> The Phase II subsurface investigation included a geophysical survey, the advancement of 12 soil borings, and the <br /> collection of one shallow soil sample and one four-point composite soil sample. A total of 14 soil samples were <br /> analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and metals. After analysis, the Phase II <br /> investigation determined that various metals are present within the subsurface at shallow depths; however, none <br /> of the detected metals exceed California Code of Regulations Title 22 criteria indicating that on-site soils would be <br /> considered a hazardous waste. If affected soil were to be moved off site, additional sampling may be required to <br /> confirm whether the soil meets receiving facility criteria, although such sampling would be required only to meet <br /> receiving facility criteria and the retaining of soil on site would not pose a risk to future occupants of the site. <br /> The Phase II investigation also found evidence of residual total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil beneath the <br /> project site; however, these detections are below the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board <br /> Enter project#s. —Initial Study 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.