Laserfiche WebLink
construction of private septic systems. <br /> Prior to issuance of a Sanitation Permit, the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division will review the <br /> proposed septic system to ensure the project's septic system is sufficiently sized and meets applicable <br /> development standards. As such, no determination of adequate capacity by a wastewater treatment provider is <br /> necessary to accommodate the project. Impacts with regard to wastewater treatment would be less than <br /> significant, and this issue will not be further evaluated in the Draft EIR. <br /> d) Less-than-Significant Impact. Solid waste generated in the project area is collected and transported by the <br /> County's contract waste hauler, Tracy Disposal Service. The City's solid waste is taken to the Tracy Material <br /> Recovery Facility and Transfer Station on South MacArthur Drive before being sent to the Foothill Sanitary <br /> Landfill. The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery publishes solid waste generation rates <br /> based on land use types. According the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, <br /> manufacturing/warehouse uses generate 1.42 pounds of solid waste per 100 square feet per day(CalRecycle <br /> n.d.). Based on these generation rates, operation of the proposed 678,913 total square feet of warehouse uses <br /> could generate solid waste at a rate of approximately 9,640 pounds of solid waste (approximately 4.8 tons) per <br /> day.' <br /> e) The Material Recovery Facility has a daily intake capacity of 1,000 tons of solid waste and on average takes in <br /> 354 tons per day. The maximum permitted daily throughput of the Foothill Sanitary Landfill is 1,500 tons per day. <br /> This facility has a permitted capacity of 138 million cubic yards and has a remaining capacity to accommodate <br /> 125 million cubic yards of solid waste. Current permits indicate a closure in 2082. Given that both the Material <br /> Recovery Facility and the Foothill Sanitary Landfill have ample remaining capacity to accept additional solid <br /> waste, the project's solid waste generation would represent only a nominal percentage of these facilities' <br /> permitted daily throughput and permitted capacities. Therefore, impacts associated with permitted landfill <br /> capacity would be less than significant, and this issue will not be further evaluated in the Draft EIR. <br /> f) Less-Than-Significant Impact. All collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste generated by the project <br /> would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Under AB 939, the Integrated <br /> Waste Management Act of 1989, local jurisdictions are required to develop source reduction, reuse, recycling, <br /> and composting programs to reduce the amount of solid waste entering landfills. Local jurisdictions are mandated <br /> to divert at least 50% of their solid waste generation into recycling. The project would be required to submit plans <br /> to the County's Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure the plan would comply with AB 939. <br /> In addition, the state has set an ambitious goal of 75% recycling, composting, and source reduction of solid waste <br /> by 2020. To help reach this goal, the state has adopted AB 341 and AB 1826. AB 341 is a mandatory commercial <br /> recycling bill, and AB 1826 is mandatory organic recycling. Waste generated by the project would enter the <br /> County's waste stream but would not adversely affect the County's ability to meet AB 939, AB 341, or AB 1826, <br /> since the project's waste generation would represent a nominal percentage of the waste created within the <br /> County. The project, much like other project and agencies, would be required to comply with these solid waste <br /> provisions during both construction and operational phases. Therefore, impacts associated with solid waste <br /> disposal regulations would be less than significant, and this issue will not be further evaluated in the Draft EIR. <br /> 3 This estimate does not account for diversion of recyclables from the solid waste stream and,thus, should be considered a <br /> conservative projection. <br /> Enter project#s. —Initial Study 36 <br />