Laserfiche WebLink
PotentiallyLess Than Less Than <br /> Significant Significant with Significant No <br /> g Mitigation g <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> II. Agriculture and Forestry Resources. <br /> In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources <br /> are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may <br /> refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and <br /> Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the <br /> California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to <br /> use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In <br /> determining whether impacts to forest resources, <br /> including timberland, are significant environmental <br /> effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled <br /> by the California Department of Forestry and Fire <br /> Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, <br /> including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and <br /> the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest <br /> carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest <br /> Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources <br /> Board. --Would the project: <br /> a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or <br /> Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as <br /> shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the X❑ <br /> California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural <br /> use? <br /> b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ ❑ X❑ <br /> Williamson Act contract? <br /> c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning <br /> of,forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code <br /> section 12220(g)), timberland j as defined by Public ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned <br /> Timberland Production (as defined by Government <br /> Code section 51104(g))? <br /> d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> forest land to non-forest use? <br /> e) Involve other changes in the existing environment <br /> which, due to their location or nature, could result in � ❑ ❑ <br /> conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or <br /> conversion of forest land to non-forest use? <br /> Impact Discussion: <br /> a) No Impact. According to the California Department of Conservation, the project site is categorized as urban and built- <br /> up land, and does not consist of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland). <br /> The nearest Farmland is located immediate north and east of the project site (CDOC 2020a). The project site was <br /> previously used for industrial uses and has not been used for agricultural uses since the 1980s (Partner 2018). <br /> Therefore, the project would have no impact associated with Farmland conversion. This issue will not be further <br /> discussed in the EIR. <br /> b) No Impact. The project site is zoned General Industrial (I-G) and is not zoned for agricultural use (County of San <br /> Joaquin 2016). The project site is not located on lands enrolled in a Williamson Act contract, and surrounding land <br /> Enter oroiect#s. —Initial Study 8 <br />