Laserfiche WebLink
4.1 – Air Quality <br />Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 <br />14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 4.1-34 <br />4.1.4 Impacts Analysis <br />Threshold A: Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? <br />Significant and Unavoidable Impact. A project is non-conforming with an air quality plan if it conflicts with or delays <br />implementation of any applicable attainment or maintenance plan. The SJVAPCD has prepared plans to attain <br />federal and state O3 and PM ambient air quality standards as required under the federal and California Clean Air <br />Act, as detailed in Section 4.1.2. The SJVAPCD has established thresholds of significance for criteria pollutant <br />emissions, which are based on SJVAPCD New Source Review offset requirements for stationary sources. Stationary <br />sources in the SJVAPCD jurisdiction are subject to some of the toughest regulatory requirements in the nation. <br />Emissions reductions achieved through implementation of the SJVAPCD offset requirements are a major <br />component of SJVAPCD’s air quality plans. Thus, projects with emissions below the thresholds of significance for <br />criteria pollutants would not conflict or obstruct implementation of the SJVAPCD’s air quality plan (SJVAPCD 2015a). <br />As discussed for Threshold B, below, the Project would exceed the SJVAPCD threshold for NOx during operations. <br />Therefore, the Project would potentially conflict with or delay implementation of the SJVAPCD attainment plans and <br />would result in a potentially significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure (MM-)AQ-1 through MM-AQ- <br />3 would reduce the Project’s impacts; however, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. <br />Threshold B: Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which <br />the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? <br />Significant and Unavoidable Impact. Past, present, and future development projects may contribute to adverse air <br />quality impacts in the SJVAB on a cumulative basis. By its nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. The <br />nonattainment status of regional pollutants is a result of past and present development, and the SJVAPCD develops <br />and implements plans for future attainment of ambient air quality standards. Based on these considerations, <br />project-level thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants are used in the determination of whether a project’s <br />individual emissions would have a cumulatively considerable contribution on air quality. If a project’s emissions <br />would exceed the applied significance thresholds, it would have a cumulatively considerable contribution. <br />Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project-specific thresholds are generally not considered to be <br />cumulatively significant. <br />Construction and operation of the Project would result in emissions of criteria air pollutants that may result in a <br />cumulatively considerable net increase in emissions of criteria air pollutants for which the SJVAB is designated as <br />nonattainment under the NAAQS or CAAQS. As discussed in Section 4.1.2, the SJVAB has been designated as a <br />nonattainment area for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 under national and/or California standards. The following discussion <br />quantitatively evaluates potential short-term construction and long-term operational impacts that would result from <br />implementation of the Project. <br />Construction Emissions <br />Construction of the Project would result in the temporary addition of pollutants to the local airshed caused by on - <br />site sources (i.e., off-road construction equipment, soil disturbance, and ROG off-gassing) and off-site sources (i.e., <br />vendor trucks and worker vehicle trips). Construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day depending <br />on the level of activity, the specific type of operation, and for dust, the prevailing weather conditions. Therefore, <br />such emissions levels can only be approximately estimated with a corresponding uncertainty in precise ambient air <br />quality impacts.