Laserfiche WebLink
4.3 – Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources <br />Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 <br />14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 4.3-5 <br />(3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents <br />the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. <br />(4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. <br />To understand the historic importance of a resource, sufficient time must have passed to obtain a scholarly <br />perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource. A resource less than 50 years old may be <br />considered for listing in the CRHR if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand its <br />historical importance (see 14 California Code of Regulations [CCR] 4852[d][2]). <br />The CRHR protects cultural resources by requiring evaluations of the significance of prehistoric and historic <br />resources. The criteria for the CRHR are nearly identical to those for the NRHP, and properties listed or formally <br />designated as eligible for listing in the NRHP are automatically listed in the CRHR, as are state landmarks and <br />points of interest. The CRHR also includes properties designated under local ordinances or identified through local <br />historical resource surveys. <br />Assembly Bill 52 <br />AB 52 of 2014 amended PRC Section 5097.94 and added PRC Sections 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, <br />21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2, and 21084.3. <br />Consultation with Native Americans <br />AB 52 formalizes the consultation process between lead agencies and tribal representatives, requiring the <br />lead agency to initiate consultation with California Native American groups that are traditionally and culturally <br />affiliated with a project area. This includes tribes that may not be federally recognized. Lead agencies are <br />required to begin consultation prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or <br />environmental impact report. <br />Tribal Cultural Resources <br />Section 4 of AB 52 adds Sections 21074 (a) and (b) to the PRC, addressing TCRs and cultural landscapes. Section <br />21074(a) defines “tribal cultural resources” as one of the following: <br />1. Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California <br />Native American tribe that are either of the following: <br />a. Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources. <br />b. Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1. <br />2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be <br />significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth <br />in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the <br />significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. <br />Section 1 (a)(9) of AB 52 establishes that “a substantial adverse change to a tribal cultural resource has a <br />significant effect on the environment.” Effects on TCRs should be considered under the California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA). Section 6 of AB 52 adds Section 21080.3.2 to the PRC, which states that parties may propose <br />mitigation measures “capable of avoiding or substantially lessening potential significant impacts to a tribal cultural <br />resource or alternatives that would avoid significant impacts to a tribal cultural resource.” Further, if a California