SR0082985_SSNL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4.3 – Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 4.3-14 Threshold D: Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? The Project would have a potentially significant impact with regard to the inadvertent discovery of paleontological resources during construction activities. With implementation of MM-CUL-3, impacts would be less than significant. Threshold E: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? AND Threshold F: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Although impacts to identified TCRs would be less than significant as a result of tribal consultation efforts, the potential to impact certain archaeological resources can also apply to TCRs. With implementation of CUL-1, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact with regard to TCRs. Threshold G: Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable impact to cultural, tribal cultural, or paleontological resources? Cumulative impacts would be potentially significant for cultural and paleontological resources. However, with implementation of MM-CUL-1 for archaeological resources, MM-CUL-2 for human remains, and MM-CUL-3 for paleontological resources, impacts would be less-than-significant. Cumulative impacts would be less-than- cumulatively considerable for TCRs and no mitigation is required. 4.3.7 References Cited County of San Joaquin. 2014. San Joaquin County General Plan Environmental Impact Report. October 2014. https://www.sjgov.org/commdev/cgi- bin/cdyn.exe/file/Planning/Environmental%20Impact%20Reports/GENERAL%20PLAN%202035%20- %20DRAFT%20EIR.pdf County of San Joaquin. 2016. San Joaquin County General Plan. December 2016. https://www.sjgov.org/ commdev/cgi-bin/cdyn.exe/file/Planning/General%20Plan%202035/GENERAL%20PLAN%202035.pdf.