Laserfiche WebLink
5 – Effects Found Not To Be Significant <br />Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2021 <br />14800 W. Schulte Road Logistics Center 5-7 <br />will ensure that adverse impacts associated with on-site soils and septic systems do not occur. Therefore, impacts <br />associated with the underlying soils’ ability to support septic systems would be less than significant. <br />Paleontological Resources <br />According to the County’s General Plan EIR (County of San Joaquin 2014), several paleontological specimens have <br />been discovered in San Joaquin County. The vast majority of paleontological specimens from San Joaquin County <br />have been found in rock formations in the foothills of the Diablo Mountain Range. However, remains of extinct <br />animals, such as mammoth, could be found virtually anywhere in the County, especially along watercourses, such <br />as the San Joaquin River and its tributaries. <br />Although the Project site is located within the proximity of these fossil-bearing features, the Project site has been <br />subject to extensive disturbance, including previous grading and utility excavation activities, that occurred as a <br />result of the prior on-site biomass energy facility. In addition, previous development of the Project site involved the <br />placement of artificial fill on the site. Transported fill materials generally do not contain significant paleontological <br />resources on or very near the surface immediately underlying a site. These activities on the Project site have <br />resulted in a site that is highly variable, containing various depressions as deep as 20 feet below ground surface. <br />Given the extent of this disturbance, it is unlikely that paleontological resources, if they were ever present on site, <br />would remain intact. Therefore, impacts associated with paleontological resources would be less than significant. <br />5.4 Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />Transport, Use, and Disposal of Hazardous Materials <br />Under existing conditions, the Project site is unoccupied and contains several soil stockpiles associated with the <br />site’s previous use as a biomass energy facility, which has since been demolished. A Phase II subsurface <br />investigation was conducted at the Project site to investigate impacts of the potential release of hazardous <br />materials that may have been handled on the Project site as a result of previous on-site operations (Partner 2018b). <br />The Phase II subsurface investigation included a geophysical survey, the advancement of 12 soil borings, and <br />the collection of one shallow soil sample and one four -point composite soil sample. A total of 14 soil samples <br />were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and metals. After analysis, the <br />Phase II investigation determined that various metals are present within the subsurface at shallow depths; <br />however, none of the detected metals exceed California Code of Regulations Title 22 criteria indicating that on - <br />site soils would be considered a hazardous waste (Partner 2018b). If affected soil were to be moved off site, <br />additional sampling may be required to confirm whether the soil meets receiving-facility criteria, although such <br />sampling would be required only to meet receiving -facility criteria, and the retaining of soil on site would not pose <br />a risk to future occupants of the site. <br />The Phase II investigation also found evidence of residual total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil beneath the Project <br />site; however, these detections are below the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board Environmental <br />Screening Levels and do not represent a significant threat to human health o r the environment (Partner 2018b). <br />Should Project implementation require the export of existing soils off site, soils would be transported to a permitted <br />facility for disposal in accordance with facility requirements and with applicable regulations. As suc h, the Phase II <br />investigation concluded that the site’s former use has not resulted in any conditions that would require remediation <br />or present a hazard to construction workers or future occupants of the Project site (Partner 2018b).