Laserfiche WebLink
LEA Advisory #51—Disposal Si ostclosure Land Use Page 3 of 5 <br /> Check if the project involves waste excavation and relocation and/or consolidation. If yes, a <br /> thorough description of this activity should be provided including project health and safety <br /> measures and waste characterization, handling, processing, and placement. This activity <br /> may also fall under DISC jurisdiction if the waste is hazardous(e.g., burn dump ash with <br /> residue exceeding hazardous levels for metals). Guidance for complete removal of waste <br /> and waste residuals("clean closure") is contained in LEA Advi..s..oryNo, 16. For the specific <br /> case of burn dump remediation, a separate LEA Advisory will be issued. <br /> 2. CEQA <br /> Does the proposal include verification of compliance with the California Environmental <br /> Quality Act(CEQA) (e.g., Notice of Determination)?CEQA is required for the discretionary <br /> approval of a project by the LEA, which would include most postclosure land use changes. <br /> In most cases the local planning department is lead agency for ensuring compliance with <br /> CEQA requirements for these projects. If so, the LEA is a responsible agency and should <br /> coordinate with the lead agency early in the process. <br /> 3. Project Layout(27 CCR 21190(a-c)) <br /> Check site maps and grading plans to ensure that the specific limits of the land use change <br /> are clearly delineated with respect to the closed disposal site and all existing environmental <br /> monitoring and control systems. Check specifically for delineation of areas on waste that <br /> will be irrigated or capped by relatively impermeable materials such as asphalt concrete. <br /> These activities can result in increased landfill gas generation and migration. Environmental <br /> monitoring and control systems to be evaluated include site security, erosion control, <br /> drainage, leachate collection and removal, and landfill gas monitoring and control. <br /> Research site files to determine if there are documented problems with landfill gas, <br /> leachate, or drainage that must be specifically addressed in the project. <br /> All construction plans should be signed and stamped by an appropriately licensed <br /> professional such as a person registered as a civil engineer in the State of California[27 <br /> CCR 21780(a)]. <br /> 4. Environmental Monitoring and Control Systems (27 CCR 21190(a),(d)) <br /> Check facility layout with respect to existing environmental monitoring and control systems. <br /> Is the land use change compatible with the existing environmental monitoring and control <br /> systems?Will these systems need to be expanded, decommissioned, or reconstructed? If <br /> so, the proposal should include revised design plans, specifications, construction schedule, <br /> and revisions to the postclosure monitoring and maintenance plan. If required, it is <br /> important that on-site maintenance personnel implement monitoring and operations plans <br /> for landfill gas, in addition to ensuring that methane alarm systems are maintained. <br /> 5.Structures (27 CCR 21190(c-g)) <br /> Does the proposal include enclosed structures on waste or within 1,000 feet of the waste <br /> footprint within the property boundary? If yes, approval by the LEA is required (27 CCR <br /> 21190(c)). If yes, check to see if construction design standards of 27 CCR 21190(e)and (g) <br /> are met in plans and specifications(flexible utility connections, floor slab barrier, vent layer, <br /> vent piping, automatic methane sensors with alarm system, periodic methane monitoring <br /> program of structure). Check for evaluation of slope stability to ensure the integrity of landfill <br /> slopes under both static and dynamic conditions(27 CCR 21145). <br /> Check that a construction quality assurance(CQA) plan has been submitted.A CQA plan <br /> should be included to ensure that construction is completed in accordance with plans and <br /> specifications. The CQA plan should also include submittal and certification of as-built plans <br /> and specifications upon completion of construction. <br /> Equivalent alternative designs can be proposed but must be supported for the intended <br /> function. For example, it is very important that any alternative proposed to the standard <br /> geomembrane barrier layer have documentation (e.g., manufacturer specifications) showing <br /> equivalent low permeability to landfill gas. In addition, exemptions are allowed from the <br /> construction standards if the applicant demonstrates on a site-specific basis that there is no <br /> potential for adverse impacts on public health and safety and the environment from landfill <br /> http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/LEAAdvisory/51/ 2/20/2008 <br />