Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Alaniz, John [EHD] <br />From:Bob Franco <bob@sierragolfmanagement.com> <br />Sent:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 2:15 PM <br />To:Alaniz, John [EHD] <br />Subject:Re: San Joaquin County EHD <br />Attachments:Haz.Mat. Invoices.pdf <br />CAUTION: This email is originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the <br />sender and know the content is safe. <br /> <br />John, <br /> <br />For violation 102, the items in the list that were hazardous waste were properly disposed of and attached is the <br />receipt from that. Some of the buckets had oily water but most were not hazardous. <br />For violation 113, please see attached. <br />For Violation 601, please see attached. <br />For violation 605, All containers containing hazardous waste have been labeled. <br /> <br />Let me know if this is okay. Thanks <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:09 AM Alaniz, John [EHD] <jalaniz1@sjgov.org> wrote: <br />Hi Bob, <br /> <br />Here are the updates <br /> <br />Violation 102: Do you mean that the items in the list were “Hazardous Waste”? If that is the case, all labels need to <br />have the following: <br />-Words “Hazardous Waste” <br />-Hazardous Property (ie toxic, corrsovie) <br />-Physical Property (liquid, solid) <br />-Accumulation start date <br />-Contents <br />Also, do you know what the items in 102 were? Were they all oily debris/used oil? <br />