Laserfiche WebLink
U N\ SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> P •• <br /> ? ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> � .! 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202-3029 <br /> � Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fa-v:(209)468-0333 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> q <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: 2,17 le A), r-L' 00ed to G/P�t�`� s PA#: rJ66 <br /> REPORT DATE: OC eC i6 ey ?d Ze <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905, Section 9-905.12 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of site(report must address all parcels), including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> [� ❑ 1.2 Description of proposed development. <br /> [►Rr ❑ 1.3 Parcel location map. <br /> [� ❑ 1.4 Site map showing location of all items on parcel. (Examples: structures, drives, wells, septic systems, large trees, <br /> pastures, pools, natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways, etc.) <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> © ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past, present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information: current and/or previous property owners, historical maps, insurance maps, previous land use <br /> applications, etc.) <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> E, ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search, EHD records search, agricultural <br /> chemical application search, site reconnaissance and survey, etc.) <br /> 0 ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handling/storage/use, aboveground/underground tanks, <br /> septic systems, injection wells, unsealed wells, ponds/lagoons, vehicle/machine repair/painting, buried or <br /> stockpiled solid waste, etc.) <br /> ® ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site (see examples above). <br /> f ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Close proximity to a former <br /> landfill/former gasoline station, in area of known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact, etc.) <br /> F ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site. <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified (in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> d ❑ 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e. collection of soil/water samples) and/or mitigative measures (i.e., clean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. <br /> ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive (i.e. all information referenced was included in this report—report should not reference <br /> other reports). <br /> ❑ 5.3 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> d ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By: e Kik " ,.�t;� �- " Reviewed Date: <br /> EHD 26-01 Pagel of 2 surface R Sub Checklist <br />